2005
DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.104.509612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Temperature, Proximity, and Course of the Esophagus During Radiofrequency Ablation Within the Left Atrium

Abstract: Background-Left atrioesophageal fistula is a devastating complication of atrial fibrillation ablation. There is no standard approach for avoiding this complication, which is caused by thermal injury during ablation. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the course of the esophagus and the temperature within the esophagus during pulmonary vein antrum isolation (PVAI) and correlate these data with esophagus tissue damage. Methods and Results-Eight-one patients presenting for PVAI underwent esophagus eval… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
177
2
7

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 198 publications
(195 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
9
177
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…253,436,507,508,622,623, 624,625,630,870,871,995,996,997,998,999,1000,1001,1002 Most of these tachycardias originate in the LA, although RA cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI)-dependent flutters might also occur. Patients with a regular AT of new onset might complain of worsening symptoms due to a faster mean ventricular rate (frequently 2:1 ventricular response) than that during AF preablation.…”
Section: Early Reablationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…253,436,507,508,622,623, 624,625,630,870,871,995,996,997,998,999,1000,1001,1002 Most of these tachycardias originate in the LA, although RA cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI)-dependent flutters might also occur. Patients with a regular AT of new onset might complain of worsening symptoms due to a faster mean ventricular rate (frequently 2:1 ventricular response) than that during AF preablation.…”
Section: Early Reablationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are 3 major issues possibly explaining differences among reports, namely catheters used, maximum energy settings, and energy titration methods. Data on catheter dependence of EU are confusing (28,62,63,64 (65). In our study, we again demonstrate a low incidence of EU using an OIC technique, confirming previous results of a randomized prospective trial.…”
Section: Identification Of a High-risk Population For Esophageal Injusupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In our study, we again demonstrate a low incidence of EU using an OIC technique, confirming previous results of a randomized prospective trial. Temperature probes were used to monitor energy delivery and temperature increase in the esophagus in other studies (28,31,58,63,65). As stated in these studies, luminal esophageal temperature (LET) monitoring has major limitations, such as malalignment of the probe to the RFA catheter and posterior LA wall, the underestimation of intramural temperature by an intraluminal probe, and the too-slow LET increase to prevent EU.…”
Section: Identification Of a High-risk Population For Esophageal Injumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Reliance on the anatomical relationships from a preprocedural CT scan is recognized as being less accurate as the range of esophageal motion during a catheter ablation for AF has been shown to be greater than 2cm. 10 It is currently unclear what the impact of oesophageal pathology is on "added" vulnerability to injury from cardiac radiofrequency energy application.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%