2009
DOI: 10.2172/960294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Technetium Leachability in Cement-Stabilized Basin 43 Groundwater Brine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A third detailed campaign to study Tc getters was performed by Duncan et al (2009) wherein a Basin 43 waste brine simulant (see Table 2.5, which represents contaminated Hanford groundwater concentrated by evaporation) was stabilized with a variant Cast Stone recipe that contained only Portland cement and the BFS at a 2:1 ratio. The two-component, Cast Stone dry blend was fortified by adding various Tc getters such that the final Cast Stone consisted of one part Basin 43 brine simulant to one part dry blend mix (consisting of the 2:1 Portland cement: BFS dry ingredients fortified with small masses of getters/reductants).…”
Section: 41mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A third detailed campaign to study Tc getters was performed by Duncan et al (2009) wherein a Basin 43 waste brine simulant (see Table 2.5, which represents contaminated Hanford groundwater concentrated by evaporation) was stabilized with a variant Cast Stone recipe that contained only Portland cement and the BFS at a 2:1 ratio. The two-component, Cast Stone dry blend was fortified by adding various Tc getters such that the final Cast Stone consisted of one part Basin 43 brine simulant to one part dry blend mix (consisting of the 2:1 Portland cement: BFS dry ingredients fortified with small masses of getters/reductants).…”
Section: 41mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cost of 2.15 SECAR 51 and the observation that its use leads to greater evolution of ammonia gas and waste form cracking late in the curing/hydration process were reasons that a switch to lime was made in the work conducted in 2006. A third waste simulant used by Cooke et al (2006cCooke et al ( , 2008 and Duncan et al (2009) was a salt concentrate from the evaporation of contaminated groundwater referred as Brine 43. The simulant composition is shown in Table 2.5.…”
Section: Range Of Wastes/compositions Testedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Cast Stone (Figure 2.1) waste form was developed at the CH2M Hill Hanford Group Inc. to solidify numerous waste streams, including secondary waste generated at the Hanford Site (Lockrem 2005b, Cooke et al 2006a, 2006c, 2006dDuncan et al 2009, Duncan and Burke 2008, Cooke et al 2007). …”
Section: Containerized Cast Stonementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11] One material that has shown potential for Tc removal in simulated groundwater is tin (II) apatite (Sn-A), ideally Sn5(PO4)3(F,Cl,OH). [14,15] The reductive capability of Sn-A arises from the presence of Sn(II), which has a favourable reduction potential for Sn(IV)/Sn(II) of 0.384 V [16] and can reduce Tc(VII) to Tc(IV). The Tc(VII)/Tc(IV) standard reduction potential is 0.738 V. [15] The reduction of TcO4by Sn(II) has been used in chemical syntheses in pharmaceutical development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%