2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2014.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of T1, T1ρ, and T2 values of the ulnocarpal disc in healthy subjects at 3 tesla

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, both T2 and T1rho measurements from conventional and UTE MR techniques generally increased with pathology, in agreement with past studies on other musculoskeletal tissues such as articular cartilage [6, 19]. To our knowledge, only one study [20] has previously reported quantitative T1 and T1rho values of the TFC discs and found a positive correlation with age. Quantitative MR, however, did not uniquely demonstrate abnormalities not seen with conventional sequences.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In our study, both T2 and T1rho measurements from conventional and UTE MR techniques generally increased with pathology, in agreement with past studies on other musculoskeletal tissues such as articular cartilage [6, 19]. To our knowledge, only one study [20] has previously reported quantitative T1 and T1rho values of the TFC discs and found a positive correlation with age. Quantitative MR, however, did not uniquely demonstrate abnormalities not seen with conventional sequences.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…11,12 Another recent report used biochemical MRI to assess degeneration of the disc proper in healthy volunteers. 13 The study found a significant difference in T2 values of the disc proper between subjects aged 30e50 years and subjects older than 50 years of age. These results suggested that increased T2 values of the disc proper reflect degeneration with aging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…This sequence uses a relatively long minimum TE (14 ms in this study) and long TE spacing (> 10 ms), which can result in suboptimal sampling of the T2 decay curve. Other T2 quantification techniques, such as gradient echo with magnetization preparation [ 32 ] and double-echo steady-state [ 33 ] techniques, may be more sensitive to changes in short T2 components. These sequences take advantage of a shorter minimum TE (2 to 4 ms) and shorter TE spacing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%