1998
DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/91.12.829
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of swallowing and referral to speech and language therapists in acute stroke

Abstract: The best clinical assessment of swallowing following acute stroke, in order to decide whether to refer a patient to a speech and language therapist (SLT), is uncertain. Independently of the managing clinical team, we prospectively investigated 115 patients (51 male) with acute stroke, mean age 75 years (range 24-94) within 72 h of admission, using a questionnaire, structured examination and timed water swallowing test. Outcome variables included referral to and intervention by a speech and language therapist (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
68
0
8

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
3
68
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…49,50 Generally, data were complete for all enrolled patients with 2 exceptions. 41,47 Of all 24 studies, only 1 study 34 reported investigator reliability of diagnostic interpretations, and 6 studies 30,34,35,37,38,44 declared blinding for outcome assessments. The characteristics of enrolled patients varied among selected studies.…”
Section: Methodological Quality and Characteristics Of Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…49,50 Generally, data were complete for all enrolled patients with 2 exceptions. 41,47 Of all 24 studies, only 1 study 34 reported investigator reliability of diagnostic interpretations, and 6 studies 30,34,35,37,38,44 declared blinding for outcome assessments. The characteristics of enrolled patients varied among selected studies.…”
Section: Methodological Quality and Characteristics Of Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two studies 32,33 did not declare stroke type characteristics. Seventeen studies limited enrollment to only conscious patients, whereas 4 studies 4,30,42,48 included patients who were obtunded. Of these, 3 studies 30,42,48 provided the number of obtunded dysphagic patients.…”
Section: Methodological Quality and Characteristics Of Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] Videofluoroscopic examination has been used as the gold standard for evaluating swallowing function but has limitations such as the inherent exposure to radiation, difficulty with performing the examination in disabled patients, and difficulties in quantitatively analyzing the biomechanics of swallowing-related organs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sixteen questionnaires were obtained using these keywords. The following inventories were excluded:  Toronto Bedside Swallowing Screening Test [12]  Burk dysphagia screening test [13]  DYMUS [14]  CMDQ [15]  MASA [16]  Dysphagia screening tool in acute stroke patients [17]  Assessment of swallowing and referral to speech and language in acute stroke [18] The following questionnaires were selected:  Clinical swallowing exam [7]  Clinical screening for dysphagia [4]  Italian reflux symptom index [10]  Self-report symptom inventory [8]  EAT-10 questionnaire [5]  SWAL-QOL questionnaire [6]  Anderson dysphagia inventory [9]  Functional oral intake scale [2] All items in these questionnaires were collected in one inventory and one item from among those measuring the same function was selected in the item reduction phase. This procedure decreased the number of items to 85.Two more items were added after clinical testing by a dysphagia expert.…”
Section: Item Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%