2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.otc.2007.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Surgical Competency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Expertise is developed and maintained at any task through extensive time spent in ‘deliberate practice' of the skill [25] and is developed through critical analysis of experience and adaptation of behavior to achieve a desired outcome. Procedural competency is difficult to define in general and can be based on expert consensus, objective measures, or self-reporting [26]. Further work to establish competency assessment in TORS procedures is needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Expertise is developed and maintained at any task through extensive time spent in ‘deliberate practice' of the skill [25] and is developed through critical analysis of experience and adaptation of behavior to achieve a desired outcome. Procedural competency is difficult to define in general and can be based on expert consensus, objective measures, or self-reporting [26]. Further work to establish competency assessment in TORS procedures is needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The need for objective quantitative assessment tools has indeed been a topic of considerable importance and interest [2] [3]. To date, however, surgical skill assessment and clinical evaluation have predominantly remained subjective [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surgical skill assessment and clinical evaluation has predominantly remained subjective [1] and developing quantitative assessment tools has been a topic of considerable importance [2,3]. Medical education has long relied on subjective evaluations or in some cases semi-quantitative (like Likert-scale based) due to the lack of reliable, accurate and stable objective and quantitative performance metrics [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Satava [15] notes virtual-simulationbased training has benefitted from the concomitant revolutions of objective assessment of procedural skills and transition from an apprenticeship-based to criterion-based training model. The growing acceptance of virtual simulators stem from ability to (1) Control presentation of stimuli to trainees [16]; (2) Accurately and transparently monitor user responses [12,17]. For example, in the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) program [18], laparoscopic training competency is measured based on metrics such as time to task completion (TTC) [13,16,19], toolpath length precision (TPL) [17,20] and dexterity of motions [21] using standardized box trainers [22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%