Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2022
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.28100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Surgeon Factors Associated With Margin Re-excision After Breast-Conserving Surgery

Abstract: We identified surgeon factors that were associated with lower re-excision rates and cavity shave margins as the most effective technique. We provided practical evidence of the benefits of routine cavity shave margins, which is now a standard practice among breast surgeons at our health system.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 17 This is important because 20% or more of all breast-conserving surgery procedures result in margins with residual disease. 18 21 Because the definitive margin status is only assessed postoperatively, patients with positive margins require a second operation, which leads to additional costs, patient anxiety, and an increased risk of post-surgical complications. In the United States alone, there are 26,550 re-excisions annually, costing approximately $125M.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 17 This is important because 20% or more of all breast-conserving surgery procedures result in margins with residual disease. 18 21 Because the definitive margin status is only assessed postoperatively, patients with positive margins require a second operation, which leads to additional costs, patient anxiety, and an increased risk of post-surgical complications. In the United States alone, there are 26,550 re-excisions annually, costing approximately $125M.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 5 As a result of these challenges, many studies report 7.8% to 50% re-excision rates in patients that underwent BCT. 7 10 With no internationally agreed-upon standard margin width set for BCT 11 , 12 and great variability in re-excision rates between surgeons, an intraoperative tool for margin assessment could allow for greater control of disease by providing greater information prior to pathologic examination, reducing positive margins, minimizing the need for reoperation, and morbidity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%