2017
DOI: 10.1177/1475921717725029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of sub-Nyquist deterministic and random data sampling techniques for operational modal analysis

Abstract: This article assesses numerically the potential of two different spectral estimation approaches supporting non-uniformin-time data sampling at sub-Nyquist average rates (i.e. below the Nyquist frequency) to reduce data transmission payloads in wireless sensor networks for operational modal analysis of civil engineering structures. This consideration relaxes transmission bandwidth constraints in wireless sensor networks and prolongs sensor battery life since wireless transmission is the most energy-hungry on-se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, the authors developed a power spectrum blind sampling (PSBS) approach [9] which relies on sub-Nyquist non-uniform in time deterministic multi-coset data acquisition to estimate the power spectral density (PSD) matrix of response acceleration signals treated as realizations of a multi-dimensional stationary stochastic process without imposing any sparsity conditions. Whilst the latter approach does not return the acceleration timeseries, it achieves quality mode shape estimation via standard frequency domain OMA techniques at lower (sub-Nyquist) sampling rates compared to standard CS techniques even for noisy signals [8].…”
Section: Proceedings Of the 8th International Conference On Computatimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alternatively, the authors developed a power spectrum blind sampling (PSBS) approach [9] which relies on sub-Nyquist non-uniform in time deterministic multi-coset data acquisition to estimate the power spectral density (PSD) matrix of response acceleration signals treated as realizations of a multi-dimensional stationary stochastic process without imposing any sparsity conditions. Whilst the latter approach does not return the acceleration timeseries, it achieves quality mode shape estimation via standard frequency domain OMA techniques at lower (sub-Nyquist) sampling rates compared to standard CS techniques even for noisy signals [8].…”
Section: Proceedings Of the 8th International Conference On Computatimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, wireless sensors are constrained by frequent battery replacement requirements leading to increase maintenance costs while their bandwidth limitations pose restrictions to the amount of data that can be reliably transmitted. It has been established that the above disadvantages may be alleviated by considering system identification techniques using measurements sampled at low rates, significantly below the nominal application-dependent Nyquist rate [4][5][6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aiming to circumvent the signal sparsity requirement for the identification of modal characteristics (natural frequencies and modal shapes) from sub-Nyquist sampled response acceleration data, Gkoktsi and Giaralis (2017), Gkoktsi and Giaralis (2019) developed an alternative to the former CS-based approaches. The latter approach couples the sub-Nyquist non-uniform-in-time deterministic multi-coset sampling strategy (Venkataramani and Bresler, 2001), with a Power Spectrum Blind Sampling (PSBS) technique (Ariananda and Leus, 2012;Tausiesakul and González-Prelcic, 2013) extended to the multi-channel case by Gkoktsi et al (2015) to estimate the response acceleration PSD matrix (second order statistics) from correlation sequences of the sub-Nyquist measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter approach couples the sub-Nyquist non-uniform-in-time deterministic multi-coset sampling strategy (Venkataramani and Bresler, 2001), with a Power Spectrum Blind Sampling (PSBS) technique (Ariananda and Leus, 2012;Tausiesakul and González-Prelcic, 2013) extended to the multi-channel case by Gkoktsi et al (2015) to estimate the response acceleration PSD matrix (second order statistics) from correlation sequences of the sub-Nyquist measurements. Ultimately, the considered PSBS approach derives structural modal properties by application of the FDD algorithm to the estimated PSD matrix without response acceleration signal recovery in the time domain and without making an a priori assumption on signal sparsity in the DFT or in any other domain (Gkoktsi and Giaralis, 2017). In doing so, measured response signals are assumed as stationary correlated stochastic processes in alignment with OMA theory (Brincker and Ventura, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation