2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2008.07.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of structure effects on the thermal conductivity of two-phase porous geomaterials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(82 reference statements)
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The two generally accepted models are parallel model and series model (Côté et al, 2009). The parallel model which is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Thermal Conductivity Boundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two generally accepted models are parallel model and series model (Côté et al, 2009). The parallel model which is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Thermal Conductivity Boundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Côte and Konrad [13] point out that heat conduction through a two-phase porous media depends on the thermal conductivity as well as the structure of the solid matrix. In terms of thermal behaviour, the structure of the solid matrix determines the contact resistance and the continuity of the solid phase [11].…”
Section: Two-phase Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil type also affects l. Soils with relatively flat grain surfaces, such as silts and clays, have more contact points between grains and higher l than do more rounded particles like sands and gravels, which have smaller contact area and lower l (Becker et al, 1992). Grain size also affects l where coarse-grained materials often maintain a higher l than fine-grained materials (Al Nakshabandi and Kohnke, 1965;Côté and Konrad, 2009). The increase in l for coarse-grained materials is due to the larger grains' ability to enable a more continuous length of high conductivity material (fewer gaps filled with air or water).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%