Assessment of stress and self-efficacy for the NIH Toolbox for Neurological and Behavioral Function

Kupst, Mary Jo; Butt, Zeeshan; Stoney, Catherine M.; Griffith, James W.; Salsman, John M.; Folkman, Susan; Cella, David

doi:10.1080/10615806.2014.994204

Cited by 68 publications

(50 citation statements)

References 47 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This finding builds upon prior work; for example, individuals with attentional problems exhibit more problems coping with stress than individuals without attentional problems (Wender, 1995), and in Swedish twins, attention deficits were positively associated with increased risk of stressful life events (Friedrichs et al, 2012). In addition, the perceived stress measure used in the present study has been shown to reliably predict and/or reflect stress in normative populations (Kupst et al, 2015).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 82%

Implicit reappraisal as an emotional buffer: Reappraisal-related neural activity moderates the relationship between inattention and perceived stress during exposure to negative stimuli

Shahane

Lopez

Denny

2018

Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Emotion regulation often is an adaptive option in the face of elevated perceived stress. Perceived stress has been shown to have negative consequences for physical and mental health, including cognitive deficits and difficulties controlling attention. Cognitive reappraisal is an emotion regulation strategy that involves changing one's cognitive construal of an emotionally evocative stimulus to alter its emotional impact. Reappraisal can be implemented explicitly or implicitly (i.e., with or without conscious awareness). The objective of the present study was to examine whether implicit cognitive reappraisal during exposure to negative stimuli moderates the relationship between inattention and perceived stress. We found, as expected, that inattention problems are associated with increased perceived stress, but also found that one's spontaneous propensity to engage in cognitive reappraisal-as indexed by correspondence with a reliable thresholded whole-brain pattern of reappraisal implementationmoderated the relationship between inattention and perceived stress. Overall, the current study provides evidence that spontaneous reappraisal recruitment has a buffering effect on the relationship between inattention and perceived stress.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 82%

Implicit reappraisal as an emotional buffer: Reappraisal-related neural activity moderates the relationship between inattention and perceived stress during exposure to negative stimuli

Shahane

Lopez

Denny

2018

Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The NIH Toolbox Perceived Stress Scale (10 items, α = .90) assesses the frequency of perceived stress in the past month [64]. This scale has established concurrent, discriminant, and factorial validity in clinical and non-clincial samples [65,66]. Questions focus on the participant's feelings and level of control in situations of acute change or mounting problems.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It is also important to note that this study used a self-report measure of perceived stress during the past month as an indicator of a person's adaptive capacity overload [66]. While perceived stress has been shown to be related to chronic pain in prior research [92,93], other types of measurement, such as biomarkers, can provide additional information regarding the specific biological processes that contribute to the relationship between stress, inflammation, and chronic pain conditions.…”

Section: Depression and Perceived Stress As Potential Mechanisms Of Omentioning

confidence: 99%

Exploring stress, cognitive, and affective mechanisms of the relationship between interpersonal trauma and opioid misuse

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background People with a history of interpersonal trauma, including intimate partner violence, sexual assault, and adverse childhood experiences, are disproportionately affected by the current opioid epidemic. Interpersonal trauma has been shown to increase risk for chronic pain conditions, prescription opioid use, and opioid misuse. Stress, cognition, and affective function have been examined as potential mechanisms that may influence opioid misuse among individuals with a history of interpersonal trauma. However, no studies have examined these factors simultaneously, despite their interrelatedness. Objective The purpose of this study was to 1) examine perceived stress, perceived cognitive function, depressive symptoms, and PTSD symptoms as potential mechanisms of opioid misuse among individuals with a history of interpersonal trauma, 2) examine the types of interpersonal trauma that are associated with opioid misuse, and 3) assess the mediating role of pain and opioid prescription. Methods A cross-sectional, observational study design was conducted. Data were collected through a confidential self-report online survey using validated instruments (n = 230). A series of regression analyses were conducted to identify mechanistic factors and interpersonal trauma types associated with opioid misuse, opioid prescription, and pain intensity. Structural equation modeling was used to examine mediating effects of pain intensity and opioid prescription. Results Opioid prescription, depressive symptoms, and intimate partner violence increased the odds of reporting opioid misuse. Pain intensity and adverse childhood experiences

show abstract

“…The PROMIS Autism Battery-Adult (PAB-A) included 18 PROMIS scales, addressing the constructs of emotional distress (depression, anxiety, anger) [Pilkonis et al, 2014;Yu et al, 2011], subjective well-being (meaning and purpose, positive affect, general life satisfaction) [Salsman et al, 2014], social health (companionship, social isolation, satisfaction with social roles, social support) [Hahn et al, 2010;Hahn et al, 2014], general self-efficacy [Kupst et al, 2015], cognitive functioning [Lai, Wagner, Jacobsen, & Cella, 2014], sleep disturbance and impairment [Buysse et al, 2010;Yu et al, 2011], and global health [Hays, Bjorner, Revicki, Spritzer, & Cella, 2009;Hays, Schalet, Spritzer, & Cella, 2017]. Scale lengths ranged from 5 to 32 items.…”

Section: Promis Scalesmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Lifespan Approach to Patient‐Reported Outcomes and Quality of Life for People on the Autism Spectrum

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Autistic self‐advocates, family members, and community organizations have called for greater emphasis on enhancing quality of life (QoL) for people with autism. Doing this is critical to understand how QoL unfolds across the life course and to clarify whether gender affects QoL, health, and functioning for people with autism. The purpose of this study was to curate and test a lifespan QoL measurement tool using freely available and well‐constructed National Institutes of Health Patient‐Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). To develop the PROMIS Autism Battery—Lifespan (PAB‐L), we identified PROMIS scales relevant for autism, reviewed each item, consulted with a panel of autism experts, and elicited feedback from autistic people and family members. This battery provides a comprehensive portrait of QoL for children ages 5–13 (through parent proxy), teens 14–17 (parent proxy and self‐report), and adults 18–65 (self‐report) with autism compared to the general population. Participants and parent informants (N = 912) recruited through a children's hospital and nationwide U.S. autism research registry completed the PAB‐L online. Results indicate that compared to general population norms, people with autism of all ages (or their proxies) reported less desirable outcomes and lower QoL across all domains. Women and girls experienced greater challenges in some areas compared to men and boys with autism. The PAB‐L appears to be a feasible and acceptable method for assessing patient‐reported outcomes and QoL for autistic people across the life course. Autism Res 2020, 13: 970‐987. © 2020 International Society for Autism Research, Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Lay Summary We developed a survey to measure the quality of life of children, teens, and adults with autism using free National Institutes of Health PROMIS questionnaires. People with autism and family members rated the PROMIS Autism Battery—Lifespan as useful and important. Some reported a good quality of life, while many reported that their lives were not going as well as they wanted. Women and girls reported more challenges in some areas of life than men and boys.

show abstract

Assessment of stress and self-efficacy for the NIH Toolbox for Neurological and Behavioral Function

Cited by 68 publications

References 47 publications

Implicit reappraisal as an emotional buffer: Reappraisal-related neural activity moderates the relationship between inattention and perceived stress during exposure to negative stimuli

Implicit reappraisal as an emotional buffer: Reappraisal-related neural activity moderates the relationship between inattention and perceived stress during exposure to negative stimuli

Exploring stress, cognitive, and affective mechanisms of the relationship between interpersonal trauma and opioid misuse

A Lifespan Approach to Patient‐Reported Outcomes and Quality of Life for People on the Autism Spectrum

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About