2017
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aex122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of standard laboratory tests and rotational thromboelastometry for the prediction of postoperative bleeding in liver transplantation

Abstract: Although both postoperative standard laboratory tests and ROTEM ® assays could identify patients at risk for postoperative bleeding, ROTEM ® assays demonstrated a greater predictive value for impaired fibrinogen polymerization-related coagulopathy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
60
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
60
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, our results show that only pFB and TEG‐MA were moderately associated with severe bleeding, although their predictive ability was far from optimal. This is in line with the findings of previous publications, which produced heterogeneous results regarding the predictive value of SLTs and viscoelastic tests for bleeding in critically ill patients with coagulopathy. Differences in design, clinical scenarios, and the time of sampling could partially explain these controversial results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Overall, our results show that only pFB and TEG‐MA were moderately associated with severe bleeding, although their predictive ability was far from optimal. This is in line with the findings of previous publications, which produced heterogeneous results regarding the predictive value of SLTs and viscoelastic tests for bleeding in critically ill patients with coagulopathy. Differences in design, clinical scenarios, and the time of sampling could partially explain these controversial results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Neither the SLTs nor the TEG parameters seem to differ between hemorrhaging and nonhemorrhaging patients. In fact, ROTEM may be inappropriate for hemostasis assessment in patients with liver cirrhosis and could lead to unnecessary blood transfusions . Overall, all these studies confirm our results, finding only a low‐to‐moderate ability of SLTs and TEG to identify hemorrhaging patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Viscoelastic haemostatic assays have a better predictive value for bleeding in liver disease (Fayed et al , ; Tafur et al , ; Pustavoitau et al , ) and re‐bleeding than SLTs (Chau et al , ). A retrospective, single centre study comparing SLT and ROTEM in post‐operative bleeding in adult liver transplant (LT) patients found that several ROTEM parameters predicted bleeding (cut‐offs shown in brackets): EXTEM CT (≥65 s), INTEM CFT (≥181 s), FIBTEM A10 (≤13 mm) and FIBTEM MCF (≤15 mm) (AUC 0·682, 0·615, 0·615 and 0·611 respectively) compared to no SLT tests (Dotsch et al , ). In cirrhotic patients, ROTEM values were associated with bleeding, specifically, reduced EXTEM MCF (median values bleeding vs non‐bleeding: 38 mm vs. 43 mm) and FIBTEM MCF (8 mm vs. 13 mm), and these values were associated with lower factor XIII levels (Bedreli et al , ).…”
Section: Liver Disease and Liver Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the theoretical prothrombotic risks of PCC and the limited data on safety for use in ALF, further evaluation is warranted . Nonetheless, studies in liver transplantation suggest a favorable safety profile, and our study also found no association with thrombosis. Descriptions of rFVIIa utilization in ALF patients have been reported in small retrospective single center observational studies; however, its cost is high, and its safety is unclear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%