2016
DOI: 10.17795/jjhs-42088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Stages and Processes of Change, Eating Self-Efficacy and Decisional Balance for Weight Loss in Obese Women Attending Nutrition Clinics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Found a relationship between TTM constructs such as self-efficacy across the stages of change with fiber intake among their studied participants, where the patients in the maintenance and action stages revealed higher self-efficacy than did those in the contemplation and preparation stages. Fifth, Ghannadiasl et al [61] who had assessed "the stages and processes of change, eating self-efficacy and decisional balance for weight loss in obese women attending nutrition clinics" and showed that the mean score of pre contemplation subscale was significantly lower than the mean total score of stages of change (P <0.001) while the mean scores of action, and maintenance subscales were significantly greater (P <0.001). Moreover, the current study showed a negative, highly statistically significant correlation (P≤ .01) between the score of decisional balance (cons) and the stage of diet behavior change before and after the intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Found a relationship between TTM constructs such as self-efficacy across the stages of change with fiber intake among their studied participants, where the patients in the maintenance and action stages revealed higher self-efficacy than did those in the contemplation and preparation stages. Fifth, Ghannadiasl et al [61] who had assessed "the stages and processes of change, eating self-efficacy and decisional balance for weight loss in obese women attending nutrition clinics" and showed that the mean score of pre contemplation subscale was significantly lower than the mean total score of stages of change (P <0.001) while the mean scores of action, and maintenance subscales were significantly greater (P <0.001). Moreover, the current study showed a negative, highly statistically significant correlation (P≤ .01) between the score of decisional balance (cons) and the stage of diet behavior change before and after the intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%