2021
DOI: 10.3791/62898
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Spatial Lingual Tactile Sensitivity using a Gratings Orientation Test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The grating orientation task where respondents determine the orientation of engraved lines (either horizontal or vertical) pressed on their tongue was described in four studies of which three included children. The measurement tools of the studies were tailor made, 3D printed (Appiani et al, 2020; Lee et al, 2022; Rabitti et al, 2021), and machine‐cut (Ross et al, 2022). All studies measured orientation identification via R‐Index controlling for response biases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The grating orientation task where respondents determine the orientation of engraved lines (either horizontal or vertical) pressed on their tongue was described in four studies of which three included children. The measurement tools of the studies were tailor made, 3D printed (Appiani et al, 2020; Lee et al, 2022; Rabitti et al, 2021), and machine‐cut (Ross et al, 2022). All studies measured orientation identification via R‐Index controlling for response biases.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For letter recognition, most studies referred to a common test protocol by (Essick et al, 1999) leading to a more homogenous implementation. In this review two recent methodological studies were identified, for one‐point pressure (Etter et al, 2020) and grating orientation (Rabitti et al, 2021) could guide further harmonization of methods. Etter et al (2020) described a one‐point pressure test protocol based on discrimination instead of detection which showed a higher discriminability between respondents.…”
Section: Synthesis Of Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations