1976
DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.1976.01770090101010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Social Adjustment by Patient Self-Report

Abstract: Westerman, M. A. (2011). Defenses in interpersonal interaction: Using a theory-building case study to develop and validate the theory of interpersonal defense.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
976
3
21

Year Published

1987
1987
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,671 publications
(1,008 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
8
976
3
21
Order By: Relevance
“…Clinical characteristics included the following: (1) baseline abstinence based on urine drug and breath alcohol screens; (2) days of substance use (drug/alcohol) in the 90 days preceding baseline assessment (timeline follow-back method); 21 (3) age of onset for first substance use; (4) primary substance of abuse; (5) screening for psychiatric disorders including attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorders (i.e., panic, social, and generalized anxiety disorders); 22 (6) psychological distress level (Brief Symptom Inventory-18); 23 (7) perception of physical health (EQ5D Quality of Life questionnaire); 24 (8) social functioning; 25 (9) medical service utilization during the prior 90 days (i.e., doctor visits, emergency department visits, and hospital admissions); and (10) cognitive function (i.e., working memory, immediate/delayed memory, logical association of familiar concepts, and spatial recognition) (the MicroCog computerized assessment of cognitive functioning). 26 Internet access was assessed at baseline and categorized as a binary variable, Bno internet access in the past 90 days^and Bany use in the past 90 days.Ô utcome variables included acceptability of web-based TES, abstinence in the last 4 weeks of the study, and treatment retention.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical characteristics included the following: (1) baseline abstinence based on urine drug and breath alcohol screens; (2) days of substance use (drug/alcohol) in the 90 days preceding baseline assessment (timeline follow-back method); 21 (3) age of onset for first substance use; (4) primary substance of abuse; (5) screening for psychiatric disorders including attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorders (i.e., panic, social, and generalized anxiety disorders); 22 (6) psychological distress level (Brief Symptom Inventory-18); 23 (7) perception of physical health (EQ5D Quality of Life questionnaire); 24 (8) social functioning; 25 (9) medical service utilization during the prior 90 days (i.e., doctor visits, emergency department visits, and hospital admissions); and (10) cognitive function (i.e., working memory, immediate/delayed memory, logical association of familiar concepts, and spatial recognition) (the MicroCog computerized assessment of cognitive functioning). 26 Internet access was assessed at baseline and categorized as a binary variable, Bno internet access in the past 90 days^and Bany use in the past 90 days.Ô utcome variables included acceptability of web-based TES, abstinence in the last 4 weeks of the study, and treatment retention.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For both groups, exclusion criteria comprised being under 25 or over 65 years of age, being left-handed, non- Weissman and Bothwell, 1976). The SAS-SR is a self-report questionnaire that evaluates daily functioning, and includes questions on social and leisure activities, relationships with the marital partner, children and extended family, and perception of economic status.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mental health–related functioning was assessed with the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey summary score (27). Social functioning was measured by the Social Adjustment Scale–Self Report (28), which examines social role performance in six domains. Finally, shame was assessed with the corresponding subscale of the Differential Emotions Scale (29), wherein respondents report the frequency of experiences of shame in their daily lives.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%