2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11269-021-02966-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Shear Stress Distribution in Meandering Compound Channels with Differential Roughness Through Various Artificial Intelligence Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, Khuntia et al (2018) used an ANN methodology to forecast the distribution of wall shear stress in straight compound channels. Mohanta et al (2021) used several AI techniques, such as MARS, GMDH-NN, and GEP, to formulate model equations for compound channels characterized by meandering patterns and relative roughness. In comparison to the GEP and MARS models, the findings indicate that the proposed GMDH-NN model exhibited a high degree of accuracy in predicting the values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, Khuntia et al (2018) used an ANN methodology to forecast the distribution of wall shear stress in straight compound channels. Mohanta et al (2021) used several AI techniques, such as MARS, GMDH-NN, and GEP, to formulate model equations for compound channels characterized by meandering patterns and relative roughness. In comparison to the GEP and MARS models, the findings indicate that the proposed GMDH-NN model exhibited a high degree of accuracy in predicting the values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various studies have investigated the lateral velocity profile, sharing of depth averaged velocity as well as shear force, transference of momentum, and discharge calculation in meandering compound channels ([1]; [2]; [3]; [4]; [5]; [6]; [7]; [8]; [9]; [10][11][12][13][14][15]). Also numerous investigations were carried out to examine the flow pattern at channel confluence considering various geometrical parameters by using numerical methods ( [16]; [17]; [18]; [19]; [20]; [21]; [22]; [23]; [24]; [25][26][27]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%