2001
DOI: 10.1006/eesa.2001.2111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Selenium Effects in Lotic Ecosystems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A few other trace elements had significant site‐specific differences in rainbow or brook trout but were not consistently different in the two species at the same sites. The potential for other elements to antagonize or potentiate the toxicity of Se has been discussed elsewhere [10].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few other trace elements had significant site‐specific differences in rainbow or brook trout but were not consistently different in the two species at the same sites. The potential for other elements to antagonize or potentiate the toxicity of Se has been discussed elsewhere [10].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in Se bioaccumulation have been described between lentic (stream) and lotic (lake) environments (Hamilton and Palace 2001; Brix et al 2005; Orr et al 2006). This could at least partially reflect the observations described above: if other conditions are similar, environments with longer residence times, such as lakes, tend to have greater recycling, a higher ratio of particulate and/or dissolved Se, and higher concentrations of Se entering the food web.…”
Section: Model Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selenate is less toxic and bioavailable compared to selenite or Se‐met, which could greatly reduce the overall impacts of total Se concentrations in the water column of lotic versus lentic systems. This proposed approach has been criticized by Hamilton [42], however, because it does not consider the relationship of different habitats associated with lotic systems, such as backwaters, side channels, and reservoirs.…”
Section: Selenium In Lotic Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study by Swift has been reviewed by Hamilton [42], who concluded that the Monticello streams best represent all habitat types that would be found in most stream environments, particularly because the population effects in these streams had been good predictors of laboratory‐derived criteria. However, effects on fish populations in these streams were not maintained throughout the entire duration of the experiment, which could mean that temporary holding of fish was stressful.…”
Section: Selenium In Lotic Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%