2016
DOI: 10.3126/ajms.v7i5.15037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of role of eosinophils in the progression of tongue carcinoma

Abstract: Background: Tumor associated tissue eosinophilia (TATE) is known as stromal infiltration of eosinophils in the stroma of tumor not associated with tumor necrosis or ulceration. It has been described in a variety of neoplasms, but the role in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) of tongue has not yet been clearly defined. Association of TATE with OSCC has shown variable results ranging from favorable to unfavorable or even no influence on prognosis.Aims and Objectives: The aim of the present study was to correla… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[18,19] Numerous studies have shown an improved prognosis with TATE in various types of solid tumors, including OSCC, independent of other standard prognostic factors (e.g., stage, age, sex, alcohol or tobacco history, histologic grading, vascularization, vascular invasion, and neural invasion). [20] These studies [4,[21][22][23][24][25][26] favor that increased number of tissue eosinophil associated with anti-tumoral role and shows good prognosis. Furthermore, there have been conflicting reports of TATE as a poor prognostic indicator in OSCC, although it has been suggested that this discrepancy may be related to differences in study methods and design.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…[18,19] Numerous studies have shown an improved prognosis with TATE in various types of solid tumors, including OSCC, independent of other standard prognostic factors (e.g., stage, age, sex, alcohol or tobacco history, histologic grading, vascularization, vascular invasion, and neural invasion). [20] These studies [4,[21][22][23][24][25][26] favor that increased number of tissue eosinophil associated with anti-tumoral role and shows good prognosis. Furthermore, there have been conflicting reports of TATE as a poor prognostic indicator in OSCC, although it has been suggested that this discrepancy may be related to differences in study methods and design.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Few studies even suggest that there is no prognostic value of TATE in OSCC. [4,30] Histopathological grading of tumor is done based on the differentiation of cells as well, moderate and poorly differentiated and is a standard method to assess the behavior of the tumor. [4] In the present study, we observed that TATE is decreasing from well-differentiated OSCCs to poorly differentiated OSCCs, though we did not get the significant difference between TATE in histopathological grades of OSCC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations