2010
DOI: 10.1051/limn/2010008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of richness estimation methods on macroinvertebrate communities of mountain ponds in Castilla y León (Spain)

Abstract: -Complete inventories of the fauna at a given place, for a specific community or geographical area are often exceedingly hard to get. In recent years a number of estimation techniques have emerged that can be used to extrapolate from these samples to the true number of species in an area. These estimation models are based on different mathematical approaches and can be classified as either species accumulation curves or nonparametric estimators (Brose et al., 2003, Ecology, 84, 2364-2377. In this paper, we hav… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(106 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both species richness estimators failed to reach a stable value for hypogean species, while ICE reached the stable value of 35 epigean species after seven out of nine caves. Both estimators recorded higher estimates for patchy distribution and exhibited DISCUSSION From the available estimators (Chazdon et al 1998;Walther and Morand 1998;Chiarucci et al 2001;Brose 2002;Brose and Martinez 2004;Martínez-Sanz et al 2010) some were tested for a more accurate picture of species richness patterns. To date, for vadose assemblages, only rarefaction curves and Chao estimator were used to assess copepod species richness at local and regional scale in the Dinaric Mountains of Slovenia (Pipan and Culver 2007).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both species richness estimators failed to reach a stable value for hypogean species, while ICE reached the stable value of 35 epigean species after seven out of nine caves. Both estimators recorded higher estimates for patchy distribution and exhibited DISCUSSION From the available estimators (Chazdon et al 1998;Walther and Morand 1998;Chiarucci et al 2001;Brose 2002;Brose and Martinez 2004;Martínez-Sanz et al 2010) some were tested for a more accurate picture of species richness patterns. To date, for vadose assemblages, only rarefaction curves and Chao estimator were used to assess copepod species richness at local and regional scale in the Dinaric Mountains of Slovenia (Pipan and Culver 2007).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Species richness per site was estimated using the Chao estimator (Chao 1984;Shen et al 2003). It is commonly used to determine the richness of organisms in natural environments based on repeated quantitative samples (Brose et al 2003;Mart ınez-Sanz et al 2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To ensure that the results were consistent, the completeness of the entire taxa inventory generated was assessed using a nonparametric estimator (chao2, the "specpool" function of the R package "vegan"), as suggested by Walther and Moore (2005), which has already been used in macroinvertebrate community analyses (e.g., Martínez-Sanz et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%