2013
DOI: 10.1038/tp.2013.74
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of reward responsiveness in the response bias probabilistic reward task in rats: implications for cross-species translational research

Abstract: Mood disorders, such as major depressive disorder, are characterized by abnormal reward responsiveness. The Response Bias Probabilistic Reward Task (hereafter referred to as probabilistic reward task (PRT)) quantifies reward responsiveness in human subjects, and an equivalent animal assessment is needed to facilitate preclinical translational research. Thus, the goals of the present studies were to develop, validate and characterize a rat analog of the PRT. Adult male Wistar and Long–Evans rats were trained in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
93
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
4
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, Roche recently stopped trials testing a GlyT-1 inhibitor for the improvement of negative symptoms in schizophrenia, perhaps due in part to the sole reliance on clinical rating scales rather than objective translational laboratory tests as primary outcome measures. Testing negative symptoms using laboratory-based measures with relevance to those presented here may provide more relevant cross-species findings (Barnes et al, 2014;Der-Avakian et al, 2013;Young et al, 2013b) and greater sensitivity to the effects of GlyT-1 inhibitors. Constitutively reducing Sp4 expression in mice resulted in impaired attention that was remediated by GlyT-1 inhibition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In fact, Roche recently stopped trials testing a GlyT-1 inhibitor for the improvement of negative symptoms in schizophrenia, perhaps due in part to the sole reliance on clinical rating scales rather than objective translational laboratory tests as primary outcome measures. Testing negative symptoms using laboratory-based measures with relevance to those presented here may provide more relevant cross-species findings (Barnes et al, 2014;Der-Avakian et al, 2013;Young et al, 2013b) and greater sensitivity to the effects of GlyT-1 inhibitors. Constitutively reducing Sp4 expression in mice resulted in impaired attention that was remediated by GlyT-1 inhibition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A growing number of translational tests have been developed in both rodents and humans including the ASST (Leeson et al, 2009;Young et al, 2010), the Behavioral Pattern Monitor (Young et al, 2007), the Response Bias Probabilistic Reward Task (Der-Avakian et al, 2013), and the 5-choice Continuous Performance Test among others. Clinical data sets face confounds such as variations in age and the use of other substances that can be controlled in animal studies.…”
Section: Comparative Analyses Of Data From Humans and Micementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In support, of this hypothesis data in healthy humans 74 and rats 75 demonstrate that nicotine increases response bias while nicotine withdrawal, characterized by anhedonia, reduced response bias development in rats 75 Most relevant to this review article is the fact that Markou and colleagues translated the RBPRT that was originally developed in humans to rats. 76 Short and long duration tones are used as the stimuli that the rats have to discriminate while performing in this task. All parameters of the rat version of the task, including percentage of responses that are reinforced and ratio of reinforcement for the 2 target stimuli, are identical in the human and rat versions.…”
Section: Integrating Reward Feedback For Decision Makingmentioning
confidence: 99%