2020
DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Respiratory Bacterial Coinfections Among Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2-Positive Patients Hospitalized in Intensive Care Units Using Conventional Culture and BioFire, FilmArray Pneumonia Panel Plus Assay

Abstract: Up to 15% of patients infected by SARS-CoV-2 present severe forms requiring hospitalisation in intensive care units and which are associated with high mortality. The prevalence of bacterial infections in these patients is not well established and more data are needed to guide empiric antibiotic therapy and improve patient outcomes. In this prospective multicenter study, we assessed bacterial co-infections identified in culture from 99 French patients infected by SARS-Cov-2 and hospitalized in intensive care un… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
53
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
53
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The pandemic of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-associated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a major threat for global health, worldwide. Approximately 15% of patients develop a severe respiratory failure requiring hospitalization in intensive care units (ICUs) ( Kolenda et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pandemic of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-associated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a major threat for global health, worldwide. Approximately 15% of patients develop a severe respiratory failure requiring hospitalization in intensive care units (ICUs) ( Kolenda et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, such detection does not guarantee live bacterium analogous to the issue of viable versus non-viable virus with similar technology. Kolenda et al [ 129 ] tactfully address this issue with corroborative evidence. They found that up to 60% of bacteria found by amplification assay could not be corroborated with culture results.…”
Section: The Covid-19 Experiencementioning
confidence: 94%
“…Some patients may have carriage of high numbers of potentially pathogenic bacteria in either the respiratory tract or at the endotracheal site during intubation without infection. The potential for such ambiguity is illustrated by several studies in which molecular amplification studies have been used for secondary bacterial diagnosis [100,[125][126][127][128][129]. Although there is a correlation of amplification Ct values with bacterial load, even such quantitative assessment does not necessarily imply infection.…”
Section: The Impact Of Covid-19 On Associated Post-onset Bacterial Infectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Data are increasing regarding bacterial co-infections in the severe disease caused by SARS-CoV-2, but the subject is not yet fully understood [ 21 , 22 ]. GPB are the most common pathogens that cause community-acquired pneumonia co-infections in COVID-19 subjects, although there is an increasing ratio of infections with GNB among hospital-acquired lung superinfections [ 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 ]. Ceftobiprole may fit within a monotherapy stewardship intervention in patients with CAP or HAP at risk for MRSA or Pseudomonas aeruginosa [ 29 ], with or without subsequent de-escalation ( Figure 1 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%