Assessment of research productivity of Arab countries in the field of infectious diseases using Web of Science database

Abstract

BackgroundTo meet the future challenges of infectious diseases and limit the spread of multidrug resistant microorganisms, a better understanding of published studies in the field of infectious diseases is needed. The objective of this study was to analyze the quantity and quality of research activity in the field of infectious diseases in Arab countries and compare it with that in non-Arab countries.MethodsDocuments published in Arab countries within the research category of “infectious diseases” were extracted and analyzed using the Web of Science database. The data analyzed represent research productivity during the time interval between 1900 – 2012.ResultsWorldwide, the total number of documents published in the field of infectious diseases up to 2012 was 227,188. A total of 2,408 documents in the field of infectious diseases were published in Arab countries, which represents 1.06% of worldwide research output. Research output from Arab countries in the field of infectious diseases was low for decades. However, approximately a five-fold increase was observed in the past decade. Arab countries ranked 56th to 218th on the standard competition ranking (SCR) in worldwide publications in the field of infectious diseases. Egypt, with a total publication of 464 (19.27%) documents ranked first among Arab countries, while Kuwait University was the most productive institution with a total of 158 (6.56%) documents. Average citation per document published in Arab countries was 13.25 and the h-index was 64. Tuberculosis (230; 9.55%), malaria (223; 9.26%), and hepatitis (189; 7.8%) were the top three infectious diseases studied as according to the retrieved documents.ConclusionThe present data reveals that some Arab countries contribute significantly to the field of infectious diseases. However, Arab countries need to work harder to bridge the gap in this field. Compared with non-Arab countries in the Middle East, research output from Arab countries was high, but more efforts are needed to enhance the quality of this output. Future research in the field should be encouraged and correctly directed.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/2049-9957-4-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

A bibliometric-based evaluation on environmental research in the Arab world

“…The Arab world is currently contributing less than 0.5% of published papers appearing in 200 major medical journals (Maziak 2005). This finding has been also confirmed in other bibliometric studies that have been conducted over medical research at Arab world level (Sweileh et al , 2015. Otherwise, in some fields of research such desalination, the contribution of Arab world to global research was unique and valued about 16% (Zyoud and Fuchs-Hanusch 2016).…”

Arab world’s growing contribution to global leishmaniasis research (1998–2017): a bibliometric study

“…The WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region reported a very high proportion (82%) of countries endemic for cutaneous and visceral leishmaniasis [4]. The status of the health-research system in the Arab world has been described previously in numerous areas of health such as dengue research [21], pharmaceutical wastewater research [57], integrative and complementary medicine research [58], toxicology research [59], tobacco smoking research [60], breast cancer research [61], and infectious disease research [62]. Health-research systems in the Arab world are perceived as being non-productive system due to low priority in national research funding levels and development planning [63][64][65].…”

Bibliometric analysis of global scientific research on carbapenem resistance (1986–2015)

“…Retrieval of published articles on a certain topic can be achieved through the use of databases like PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, or Web of Science. In the past decade, a number of bibliometric studies on specific types of infections and on specific types of medical subjects like microbiology were published [12][13][14]. However, no bibliometric studies have been carried out on carbapenem resistance.…”