2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2020.106151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of reduced beam section (RBS) moment connections subjected to cyclic loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Europe, on the other hand, RBS has not been a prevalent field of study until the last decade [189], even if it had some of the earlier, pre-Northridge, applications [190].…”
Section: Bolted Connections In Reduced Beam Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Europe, on the other hand, RBS has not been a prevalent field of study until the last decade [189], even if it had some of the earlier, pre-Northridge, applications [190].…”
Section: Bolted Connections In Reduced Beam Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stiffness and behavior of the classic bolted joints have already been widely studied in a large number of research works [ 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 ], various studies have also been carried out on dynamic stress assessment of bolted joints [ 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ], but studies about clamped joints are still pending. In addition, this type of joint and its calculation is already included in various standards, such as the Eurocode 3 [ 10 , 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This variation affects the joint's moment rotation diagram, thereby causing a variation of the joint's bending moment absorption capacity and a variation of the structure's stiffness compared to when the joints are fully rigid. The stiffness and behavior of the classic bolted joints have already been widely studied in a large number of research works [12][13][14][15][16][17], various studies have also been carried out on dynamic stress assessment of bolted joints [18][19][20][21], but studies about clamped joints are still pending. In addition, this type of joint and its calculation is already included in various standards, such as the Eurocode 3 [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first investigation on double reduced beam section was carried out by [57], in which two adjacent radius cuts was implemented in beam flange named as DRBS, and concluded that implementing the second cut leads to maximum equivalent plastic strain index reduction as well as delaying the local buckling. Investigating the behavior of RBS connections through numerical or experimental studies in the recent years are conducted by many researchers among which [67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76] can be mentioned. Fanaie et al [69] pointed to a method in which a mathematical approach in conjunction with principles of structural analysis is employed in order to acquire the drift as well as changes in stiffness of stories in frames with RBS connections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although comparing the behavior of interior connections with voids in beam web or flange has received numerous attention, there exists a significant ambiguity regarding the behavior of frames with web or flange cuts since cutting a part of the beam alters the force transfer from the beam to the column [95,129] and parameters affecting the strength of the frame such as opening area, shape, use of stiffeners, etc., are of great significance in the behavior, resistance, energy dissipation capacity, and failure mode of the connections [2,[23][24][25]114]. Hence, numerous studies have been conducted on steel connections including Reduced Beam Section (RBS) [64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79], Reduced Web Section (RWS) , Drilled Flange Connection (DFC) [115][116][117][118][119][120][121][122][123][124][125], and many design codes and standards [1,10,[18][19][20][27][28][29] employed the introduced connections as an engineered connections. Since each connection has advantages and disadvantage, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%