2020
DOI: 10.1080/10407782.2020.1803592
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of RANS and LES turbulence models for natural convection in a differentially heated square cavity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the discrepancy of the large eddy simulation is also due to the presumption of a full alignment between components of the turbulent heat flux and mean temperature gradient. Improvement of the Large Eddy Simulation was demonstrated by Clifford and Kimber [7] in the study of Assessment on the model of RANS and LES for convective flow in a square cavity heated from the side, in which the model yielded nearly identical results from both DNS and experiment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the discrepancy of the large eddy simulation is also due to the presumption of a full alignment between components of the turbulent heat flux and mean temperature gradient. Improvement of the Large Eddy Simulation was demonstrated by Clifford and Kimber [7] in the study of Assessment on the model of RANS and LES for convective flow in a square cavity heated from the side, in which the model yielded nearly identical results from both DNS and experiment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been an extensive study on natural convection in cavities for various geometry and a wide range of turbulence levels, namely by Gunarjo [1], Clifford and Kimber [2], Ji [3], and Saury et al, [4]. The authors have applied the Boussinesq approximation as the mathematical basis in developing their models, in which all properties are assumed to be constant while density is treated as a variable of gravity that is linearly proportional to temperature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main challenge for the Unsteady RANS (URANS) is the simultaneous existence of both laminar and turbulent regions and the underlying transition from laminar to turbulent flow. It is known that eddyviscosity-based turbulence models cannot capture laminar-turbulence transition accurately due to simplistic strain-stress relation (Vieira et al 2012;Ammour et al 2013;Clifford and Kimber 2020). Another disadvantage of the RANS approach is the requirement of complicated stochastic models for particles that are needed to take into account the effect of turbulence.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%