2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.05.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Quality and Readability of Internet Dietary Information on Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is increasing evidence that internet-based strategies may be of value in the treatment of gastrointestinal diseases. There are several websites and software applications providing information on the low-FODMAP diet, but the information is often of low quality with a wide variety of recommendations (76,77). The advantages of software applications and home monitoring include offering the patient quick and easy access to nutritional advice and providing patients with more individualized treatment (78).…”
Section: Description Of Professional Guidance During the Dietary Trea...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is increasing evidence that internet-based strategies may be of value in the treatment of gastrointestinal diseases. There are several websites and software applications providing information on the low-FODMAP diet, but the information is often of low quality with a wide variety of recommendations (76,77). The advantages of software applications and home monitoring include offering the patient quick and easy access to nutritional advice and providing patients with more individualized treatment (78).…”
Section: Description Of Professional Guidance During the Dietary Trea...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is consistent with gastroenterologists reporting that over half of their patients with irritable bowel syndrome attempt to self‐manage their symptoms with dietary interventions, most often using a “trial and error” approach 8 . The frequency of self‐initiated diets may also be due growing availability of online resources about dietary interventions and the increased production and marketing of specialty food products (e.g., gluten‐free, vegan), but concerns remain about both the quality of this content 45 and lack of dietetic supervision 46,47 . We also found that almost half of exclusion diets had been documented as recommended by a provider, with 30% of all reported diets recommended by a GI provider.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…This is a particular concern, as a majority of patients prefer to receive medical information directly from healthcare physicians rather than from the internet, handouts, or books 23 . Unfortunately, for those subjects with FGIDs who do search for diet information on the internet, the information is often of low quality with a wide variety of recommendations provided 24 . Additionally, further research is needed to determine the most efficacious, practical diet(s) and nutrition interventions using evidence‐based principles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%