2015
DOI: 10.1504/ijise.2015.072267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of qualitative factors affecting uncertainty measurement using AHP

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Quality cost is the cost of detecting and improving the quality of goods and services (Hansen & Mowen, 2006). Mandavgade, Jaju, & Lakhe (2015) divide quality costing into 4 main parts and known as PAF (Prevention-Appraisal-Failure). There are the follow items:…”
Section: Quality Costingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Quality cost is the cost of detecting and improving the quality of goods and services (Hansen & Mowen, 2006). Mandavgade, Jaju, & Lakhe (2015) divide quality costing into 4 main parts and known as PAF (Prevention-Appraisal-Failure). There are the follow items:…”
Section: Quality Costingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main purpose of quality costing is to provide information to improve the quality of higher education (Mandavgade et al, 2015) as the formal institution where the institution define as any form of constraint that human beings devise to shape human interaction (Zusmelia, Firdaus, & Ansofino, 2019).. Quality cost is also a useful technique for continuous improvement to improve the quality of education and services at tertiary institutions in which the quality cost provides information for improving the quality of the process by displaying starting from prevention costs, assessment costs and the costs of internal failures and external failures. The implementation of quality costing must also have a top-down commitment to succeed because achievement is a process that cannot be realized in the short term.…”
Section: Theoretical Compatibility Between Strategic Costing Attributementioning
confidence: 99%
“…And then, according to the risk level, develop appropriate response plans to construct a set of scientific risk defense system. At present, in the research of network security evaluation, the index system is weighted by analytic hierarchy process (AHP) [3,4,5]. However, the traditional AHP mainly depends on human judgment, because the relative importance of each factor in the actual environment is not so exact, the degree of importance is difficult to determine by the numerical value measured by the subjective experience.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%