2017 IEEE Conference on Dependable and Secure Computing 2017
DOI: 10.1109/desec.2017.8073833
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of QoS adaptation and cyber-defense mechanisms in networked systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Quality of Service (QoS) [19] adaptation in network slicing is critical for meeting diverse application needs. Studies have explored mechanisms like Squatting and Kicking Strategies (SKM) for resource utilization [20], neural network-based user adaptation to QoS policies [21], hybrid deep learning for network reconfiguration [22], per-user QoS guarantees [23], and Morphnet for network management [24]. These approaches are crucial for maintaining QoS in network slices.…”
Section: Qos Adaptation Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quality of Service (QoS) [19] adaptation in network slicing is critical for meeting diverse application needs. Studies have explored mechanisms like Squatting and Kicking Strategies (SKM) for resource utilization [20], neural network-based user adaptation to QoS policies [21], hybrid deep learning for network reconfiguration [22], per-user QoS guarantees [23], and Morphnet for network management [24]. These approaches are crucial for maintaining QoS in network slices.…”
Section: Qos Adaptation Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%