1996
DOI: 10.1097/00002517-199604000-00005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Pseudarthrosis in Pedicle Screw Fusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Strengths are the homogeneous patient population in clinical assessment, age and gender and the standardized dedicated radiological approach. The sample size was comparable to earlier studies [9,13]. Kappa values were stable in either dichotomy with relatively narrow confidence intervals.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Strengths are the homogeneous patient population in clinical assessment, age and gender and the standardized dedicated radiological approach. The sample size was comparable to earlier studies [9,13]. Kappa values were stable in either dichotomy with relatively narrow confidence intervals.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Thinsliced helical CT scans showed greater interobserver agreement and better illustration of bony bridging than static or bending radiographs [4,[8][9][10][11][12]. Comparison of either modality with surgical inspection documented not much agreement for plain radiographs [13] and posterolateral fusions on dedicated fine-cut CT were found moderately predictive of a solid fusion on surgical exploration [5]. The development of multidetector CT (MDCT) and dedicated protocols made it possible to minimize metallic artifacts [14,15] and allowed for isotropic coronal and sagittal reconstruction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiography however is dreadfully unreliable in detecting non-union (its accuracy ranges from 82%-68% [44,45] ) when compared to surgical exploration. Flexion-extension views may be helpful in detecting instability in the fused segments, although their value in the lumbar spine has been questioned [46,47] . Helical CT scanning has demonstrated better accuracy [48,49] although surgical exploration remains the "gold standard" [50] .…”
Section: Pseudarthrosis (Non-union)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite advances in imaging quality, radiographs at best are only two dimensional and dynamic radiographs though helpful in ruling out instability have their own limitations. The main shortcoming of dynamic x-rays includes measurement reliability and disagreement between observers on permissible motion [14]. Computed tomography (CT) is more sensitive in detecting non-union and is investigation of choice to confirm or rule out pseudarthrosis [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%