Assessment of Primary Colorectal Cancer Heterogeneity by Using Whole-Tumor Texture Analysis: Contrast-enhanced CT Texture as a Biomarker of 5-year Survival

Abstract

FRCR Purpose:To determine if computed tomographic (CT) texture features of primary colorectal cancer are related to 5-year overall survival rate. Materials and Methods:Institutional review board waiver was obtained for this retrospective analysis. Texture features of the entire primary tumor were assessed with contrast material-enhanced staging CT studies obtained in 57 patients as part of an ethically approved study and by using proprietary software. Entropy, uniformity, kurtosis, skewness, and standard deviation of the pixel distribution histogram were derived from CT images without filtration and with filter values corresponding to fine (1.0), medium (1.5, 2.0), and coarse (2.5) textures. Patients were followed up until death and were censored at 5 years if they were still alive. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to determine the relationship, if any, between CT texture and 5-year overall survival rate.The Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess independence of texture parameters from stage. Results:Follow-up data were available for 55 of 57 patients. There were eight stage I, 19 stage II, 17 stage III, and 11 stage IV cancers. Fine-texture feature Kaplan-Meier survival plots for entropy, uniformity, kurtosis, skewness, and standard deviation of the pixel distribution histogram were significantly different for tumors above and below each respective threshold receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve optimal cutoff value (P = .001, P = .018, P = .032, P = .008, and P = .001, respectively), with poorer prognosis for ROC optimal values (a) less than 7.89 for entropy, (b) at least 0.01 for uniformity, (c) less than 2.48 for kurtosis, (d) at least 20.38 for skewness, and (e) less than 61.83 for standard deviation. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed that each parameter was independent from the stage predictor of overall survival rate (P = .001, P = .009, P = .006, P = .02, and P = .001, respectively). Conclusion:Fine-texture features are associated with poorer 5-year overall survival rate in patients with primary colorectal cancer.q RSNA, 2012 Supplemental material: http://radiology.rsna.org/lookup /suppl

Texture analysis of the liver at MDCT for assessing hepatic fibrosis

“…CT texture analysis is an emerging technique that quantifies heterogeneity of a region of interest by analyzing the distribution and/or relationship of pixel or voxel gray levels in the image [17]. This technique has been most intensely studied in oncologic applications, and has shown association with pathologic features and clinical outcomes in a variety of tumor types [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. Some non-oncologic applications are being evaluated, with several groups using texture analysis to assess emphysema and fibrosis in the lung [32,33].…”

MRI texture analysis of subchondral bone at the tibial plateau

“…Its value lies in detecting subtle alterations in appearance of a tissue early in the pathological process, invisible to the naked eye. TA has proven of value in several radiological studies, including colorectal cancer prognosis, structural changes in myoclonic epilepsy and differentiation of types of gastric tumour [19][20][21][22]. It has also demonstrated utility in the musculoskeletal system, for instance in evaluating articular cartilage at the knee and bone structure at the femoral neck [23,24].…”

A Narrative Review on the Current Application Biomarkers in the Management of Colorectal Cancer

“…In addition, contrast enhanced CT measuring tumour heterogeneity could emerge as a biomarker for prognosis. Study has found tumours demonstrating less heterogeneity were associated with poorer survival, supporting the use texture analysis to staging contrast-enhanced CT, and possibly serve as a prognostic biomarker in colorectal cancer [54].…”