Assessment of Prevalence, Associations ,Knowledge, and Practices about Diabetic Foot Disease in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Colombo, Sri Lanka

Abstract

Background. One in five adults in Sri Lanka has either diabetes or prediabetes, and one-third of those with diabetes are undiagnosed. Diabetic foot is a debilitating condition affecting up to 50% of patients with both type 1 and type 2 diabetes. The risk of nontraumatic lower limb amputations is 15 times higher in diabetic patients when compared with nondiabetics. Patient education about correct foot care practices is the cornerstone of prevention of diabetic foot disease. Objective. To assess the prevalence of diabetic foot disease, knowledge, and practices about diabetic foot care among diabetic patients. Methods. 334 patients attending the diabetic clinic in Colombo South Teaching Hospital were recruited according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were collected using 3 questionnaires, and they were filled using the foot examination findings, patients’ medical records, and direct interviewing of the patients. Results. The mean age of the patients included in the study was 58.23 ± 10.65 years while the median duration of diabetes was 10.54 ± 7.32 years. 34.1% patients had peripheral neuropathy, and 29.5% had peripheral vascular disease. Diabetic foot disease according to the WHO definition was present only in 23 (6.9%) patients. There was a significant association between peripheral neuropathy and current or past foot ulcer which took more than 2 weeks to heal ( p < 0.05 ). Knowledge about foot care was less among the studied population, and it was associated with poor foot care practices. Presence of diabetic foot and current or past foot ulcer which took more than 2 weeks to heal were significantly associated with the foot care knowledge and practices ( p < 0.05 ) Conclusion. Improvement of patients’ knowledge about foot care and their practices have a significant impact on the reduction of diabetic foot disease.

Self-management practices for preventing complications of type II diabetes mellitus in low and middle-income countries: A scoping review

“…For example, a meta-analysis of foot care studies in Ethiopia reported a level of foot care practice at 64% ( Dagnew et al., 2021 ). Furthermore, higher levels of foot care are reported in countries such as Sri Lanka, and the Middle East, where Islam is the predominant religion and foot hygiene is part of the religious rituals ( Kaluarachchi et al., 2020 ). Common barriers to foot care practices for patients with diabetes include inadequate education on foot care, general neglect ( Pourkazemi et al., 2020 ), and the high cost of specialised footwear ( Kaluarachchi et al., 2020 ).…”

Epidemiological, clinical, and radiological characteristics of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis in Sri Lanka – A single centre experience

“…The prevalence of diabetes mellitus in the Sri Lankan urban population is estimated at 26.7% in 2019. 12 The national prevalence of COPD was estimated at 10.5% in 2017. 13 Therefore, the prevalence of diabetes and COPD in the study population was higher than that of the general population.…”

Early intervention and care for Diabetic Foot Ulcers in Low and Middle Income Countries: Addressing challenges and exploring future strategies: A narrative review

“…A body of research has underscored the adverse consequences associated with delayed diagnosis, including an elevated risk of infection, amputation, and mortality. [4][5][6][7][32][33][34] Within LMICs, investigations have consistently demonstrated that early identification of DFUs confers numerous advantages, encompassing higher healing rates, reduced amputation frequencies, decreased health care expenditures, and enhanced overall quality of life for affected individuals. [4][5][6][7] The contrast in mortality rates between LMICs and HICs further underscores the significance of early identification.…”

“…Early detection and intervention can significantly improve wound healing, reduce the need for amputation, and improve the quality of life for individuals with DFUs 4,6,7 . However, the management strategies employed in LMICs for early DFUs may differ from those in high‐income countries (HICs) due to resource constraints and other contextual factors 5 …”