1993
DOI: 10.1097/00006199-199301000-00002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Postoperation Pain In Children and Adolescents Using The Adolescent Pediatric Pain Tool

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
122
0
18

Year Published

1994
1994
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
122
0
18
Order By: Relevance
“…Scales vary in the number of faces, whether the no-pain anchor is smiling or neutral, and whether the faces are cartoon-like, realistic drawings, or actual photos. 82 The minimum clinically Self-report Visual analog scale 81 7 y to adult Faces scales 82,128,129 3 y to adult Oucher 87 3-12 y Hester's Poker Chip Tool 130 4-7 y, often used in children as young as 3 y Colored Analog Scale 131 5-16 y Facial Affective Scale 131 5-16 y Word Descriptor Scales 132 3 y to adult Numeric rating scales 132 7 y to adult Adolescent Pediatric Pain Tool 133 8 147 Neonates Physiologic Pulse rate 148 All ages Mean arterial pressure or systolic blood pressure 148 All ages…”
Section: Pediatric Pain Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scales vary in the number of faces, whether the no-pain anchor is smiling or neutral, and whether the faces are cartoon-like, realistic drawings, or actual photos. 82 The minimum clinically Self-report Visual analog scale 81 7 y to adult Faces scales 82,128,129 3 y to adult Oucher 87 3-12 y Hester's Poker Chip Tool 130 4-7 y, often used in children as young as 3 y Colored Analog Scale 131 5-16 y Facial Affective Scale 131 5-16 y Word Descriptor Scales 132 3 y to adult Numeric rating scales 132 7 y to adult Adolescent Pediatric Pain Tool 133 8 147 Neonates Physiologic Pulse rate 148 All ages Mean arterial pressure or systolic blood pressure 148 All ages…”
Section: Pediatric Pain Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This tool includes a measure of pain intensity (translated into a 0-10 score), pain descriptors and distribution (38). Only data on pain intensity was used in the present study.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Os descritores que compõem a lista foram impressos em cartões coloridos (60x90mm) em tamanho de letra 36. Cada participante foi abordado individualmente e recebeu um conjunto de cartões todos com a mesma cor sendo pedido que relembrasse as suas experiências de dor e que colocasse os descritores em três categorias diferentes: (1) palavras que conheço e utilizo para descrever a dor; (2) palavras que conheço mas não utilizo para descrever a dor As propriedades psicométricas destes descritores revelam uma correlação moderada com a intensidade da dor e o número de locais marcados no diagrama corporal (Savedra, Holzemer, Tesler, & Wilkie, 1993;Wilkie et al, 1990). Os descritores da dimensão avaliativa estão mais fortemente relacionados com a intensidade (r=0,44; p≤0,01) comparativamente com os das dimensões afetiva (r=0,38; p≤0,01) e sensorial (r=0,35; p≤0,01) (Wilkie et al, 1990).…”
Section: Participantes E Procedimentosunclassified