2022
DOI: 10.1504/ijep.2022.10046987
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of pollution load and identifying bioindicator algal species using multivariate statistical techniques: a case study from Damodar River, India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chl-a is commonly used as a proxy for algal biomass in both lotic and lentic environments, as chl-a has been found to be positively correlated with primary productivity in streams, rivers, lakes, and oceans [38]. While traditional methods that directly measure algal biomass, such as measuring ash-free dry mass and enumerating algal cells under a microscope [39][40][41], are more exact, chl-a measurements offer a less complex and time-consuming method of estimating biomass [42,43]. Using a dichotomous key, we identified and enumerated all macroinvertebrates in a functional feeding group (i.e., collector-filterer, collector-gatherer, scraper-grazer, shredder, and predator) in each Hess sample under a dissecting microscope (10× magnification) [44].…”
Section: Lab Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chl-a is commonly used as a proxy for algal biomass in both lotic and lentic environments, as chl-a has been found to be positively correlated with primary productivity in streams, rivers, lakes, and oceans [38]. While traditional methods that directly measure algal biomass, such as measuring ash-free dry mass and enumerating algal cells under a microscope [39][40][41], are more exact, chl-a measurements offer a less complex and time-consuming method of estimating biomass [42,43]. Using a dichotomous key, we identified and enumerated all macroinvertebrates in a functional feeding group (i.e., collector-filterer, collector-gatherer, scraper-grazer, shredder, and predator) in each Hess sample under a dissecting microscope (10× magnification) [44].…”
Section: Lab Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%