2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-05019-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of pollutant removal processes and kinetic modelling in vertical flow constructed wetlands at elevated pollutant loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sulphate, the common contaminant of wastewater, is not usually considered a health concern but, under some circumstances, can cause diarrhoea. [72] Plant 2 showed a higher removal efficiency of sulphate (68.48%) when compared with other plants (53.02%, 46.77%, and 50.81% removal of sulphate was shown by Plant 1, Plant 2, and Plant 3, respectively). This was due to anaerobic conditions and substrate, which helped to remove sulphate from GW.…”
Section: Discussion On Removal Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Sulphate, the common contaminant of wastewater, is not usually considered a health concern but, under some circumstances, can cause diarrhoea. [72] Plant 2 showed a higher removal efficiency of sulphate (68.48%) when compared with other plants (53.02%, 46.77%, and 50.81% removal of sulphate was shown by Plant 1, Plant 2, and Plant 3, respectively). This was due to anaerobic conditions and substrate, which helped to remove sulphate from GW.…”
Section: Discussion On Removal Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This was due to anaerobic conditions and substrate, which helped to remove sulphate from GW. Similarly, Kumar and Singh [ 72 ] reported a high sulphate concentration in domestic wastewater treated by VFCW and observed a 50% removal efficiency using water hyacinth. For 32 wetlands, primarily HSSF and free water surface, Kadlec [ 58 ] reported a mean of 14% removal, which is much less than the present study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…CWs can be used in planted or unplanted state and both have been found successful in treating wastewater [9]. In planted CWs different macrophytes such as Cyperus papyrus, Canna, Commelina benghalensis, Eichhornia crassipes, Populus trichocarpa, Phragmites australis, Typha angustifolia, Hydrilla verticillata, and Salvinia natans were used to treat the municipal wastewater in a vertical flow CW [18]. In a study conducted by Calheiros et al [19] five different species of macrophytes, i.e., Canna indica, Typha latifolia, P. australis, Stenotaphrum secundatum, and Iris pseudacorus were used for the treatment of tannery wastewater through CW.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%