2004
DOI: 10.1557/proc-816-k8.5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Planarization length variation by the Step-Polish-Response (SPR) Method

Abstract: In spite of the fact, that the main purpose of CMP is the planarization of surfaces, most processes are optimized with respect to the removal rate. This might be due to a lack in techniques for the determination of the planarization behavior. The commonly used expression "Planarization Length" implies a maximum lateral extension over which the planarization is obtained and which can not be improved. Several attempts have been made to determine the planarization length by studying the CMP on different test patt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
(2 reference statements)
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The independence from the initial step height can be interpreted as a justification of the convolution theorem postulated in [1]. This matches again with the square root shape of the fit function in Fig.…”
Section: Results and Conclusionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The independence from the initial step height can be interpreted as a justification of the convolution theorem postulated in [1]. This matches again with the square root shape of the fit function in Fig.…”
Section: Results and Conclusionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…However, in the large and high pattern density region of the image sensor, it is not promoted because of the effect of elastic deformation of the polishing pad. The planarization length, which is defined as the width of the transition ramp between the two regions, [2][3][4] increases with the expansion of the image sensor area, and the global planarity becomes poor. The poor planarity causes yield reduction because of the focus error in the lithography process for the contact hall formation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%