2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2017.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of pit latrines in a peri-urban community in KwaZulu-Natal (South Africa) as a source of antibiotic resistant E. coli strains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At each visit, stools sample or endorectal swabs were collected. We recorded using standardized questionnaires orally administered to the mothers factors potentially associated with the risk of ESBL-PE acquisition, including habitat type, number of rooms, number of household members, parity, diet and hygiene habits, contact with animals, animal ownership, animal husbandry, hospitalization and consumption of antibiotics in the previous days, latrines [ 12 , 25 28 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At each visit, stools sample or endorectal swabs were collected. We recorded using standardized questionnaires orally administered to the mothers factors potentially associated with the risk of ESBL-PE acquisition, including habitat type, number of rooms, number of household members, parity, diet and hygiene habits, contact with animals, animal ownership, animal husbandry, hospitalization and consumption of antibiotics in the previous days, latrines [ 12 , 25 28 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An average E. coli count of 5.29 log 10 MPN/g was reported for ventilated improved pit latrine (VIP) fecal sludge in the location of the current study (Beukes et al 2017), while fecal sludge from pit latrines and urine-diverting dry toilets in Malawi contained E. coli counts of up to 3.61 and 3.74 log 10 CFU/g (Kumwenda et al 2017). E. coli counts obtained for the soil area where open defecation occurred were thus lower than counts of log 10 4.38-8.60 MPN/g reported for fresh human feces in Sierra Leone (Wright 1982).…”
Section: Sample Description Target Microorganism a A A A A A A Amentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Given an average E. coli concentration of log 10 5.29 MPN/g previously reported for pit latrine fecal sludge in KwaMashu (Beukes et al 2017), assuming that workers accidentally splashed 10 g pit latrine fecal sludge evenly over an area of 1 m 2 during pit emptying, and further considering a soil layer of 5 cm matching the typical geophagia sampling depth along with a consumption of approximately 1 g of this soil by household members, a possible risk of intake can be gaged. Possible counts for E. coli in soil samples in the current study after ≥50 days exposure of the soil to pit latrine fecal sludge would be less than 1 E. coli per g when using the decay/die-off rate of 4.0-5.0 log 10 CFU/g per 50 days employed by Brooks et al (2012) for E. coli O157:H7.…”
Section: Sample Description Target Microorganism a A A A A A A Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They point out that this simple intervention will have a global impact on the prevention of mosquito bites and the spread of diseases. Beukes et al (2017) verified existence of MDR Escherichia coli in pit latrines. They argued the presence of MDR E. coli strains in pit latrine samples demonstrated that pit latrines were potential sources for MDR bacteria.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 88%