2020
DOI: 10.17221/28/2020-jfs
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of pine aboveground biomass within Northern Steppe of Ukraine using Sentinel-2 data

Abstract: The present study offers the results of the spectral characteristics, calculated vegetative indices and biophysical parameters of pine stands of the Northern Steppe of Ukraine region obtained using Sentinel-2 data. For the development of regression models with the prediction of the biomass of pine forests using the obtained spectral characteristics, we used the results of the assessment of the aboveground biomass by the method of field surveys. The results revealed the highest correlation relations between the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remote sensing methods have a long history of development for estimation of GSV [1,[4][5][6][7][8][9][10], and a number of approaches have evolved since the 1990s, exploiting spaceborne visible and near-infrared (VNIR) imagery, radar, and more recently the incorporation of airborne measurements from airborne laser scanners and UAV (unmanned aerial vehicle, commonly referred to as a 'drone') observations. The simplest approaches are based on multispectral analysis of freely-available VNIR imagery having a spatial resolution of the order of 10 m or coarser [11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Useful enrichment of the available feature space has been demonstrated using multitemporal datasets [18][19][20][21], incorporating texture measures [14,22] and field-derived or satellite-derived three-dimensional information [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remote sensing methods have a long history of development for estimation of GSV [1,[4][5][6][7][8][9][10], and a number of approaches have evolved since the 1990s, exploiting spaceborne visible and near-infrared (VNIR) imagery, radar, and more recently the incorporation of airborne measurements from airborne laser scanners and UAV (unmanned aerial vehicle, commonly referred to as a 'drone') observations. The simplest approaches are based on multispectral analysis of freely-available VNIR imagery having a spatial resolution of the order of 10 m or coarser [11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Useful enrichment of the available feature space has been demonstrated using multitemporal datasets [18][19][20][21], incorporating texture measures [14,22] and field-derived or satellite-derived three-dimensional information [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radar data cannot yet be used independently for estimating aboveground biomass and serve as supplementary data for optical data [ 79 , 90 , 95 , 97 , 117 ]; Sentinel-2 performs better than Landsat in mapping primary variables and attributes associated with biomass in forest stands [ 77 , 91 , 106 , 119 , 120 , 121 ]; Spatial resolution is crucial for biomass estimation [ 56 , 76 , 91 , 95 ]; The texture and extent of land-cover classes increase the accuracy of biomass estimation. They are useful only as supplementary data [ 79 , 81 , 83 ]; In general, very-high-resolution satellite data are highly useful for habitat mapping [ 111 , 112 ]; The best modeling algorithms are XG-Boost, random forest, and artificial neural network [ 83 , 91 , 92 , 95 , 96 ]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The texture and extent of land-cover classes increase the accuracy of biomass estimation. They are useful only as supplementary data [ 79 , 81 , 83 ];…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although there are many publications on using ANN for the biomass estimation of grassland areas, only one or two studies have specifically applied the integration of Sentinel-2 and ANN algorithms for biomass estimation [67][68][69]. In Figure 5, the fitted line between the observed and values has a slope of 0.96 and an intercept of 0.18, showing that RF outperforms the SVR model.…”
Section: The Evaluation Of Machine Learning Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%