2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2008.01.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of performance parameters for EPR dosimetry with tooth enamel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The methodology suggested in Wieser et al (2008) was tested in sixteen laboratories. As a first approximation, varianve of EPR measurements was assumed to be constant and independent of dose.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The methodology suggested in Wieser et al (2008) was tested in sixteen laboratories. As a first approximation, varianve of EPR measurements was assumed to be constant and independent of dose.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A method for the evaluation of critical level and detection limit in EPR dosimetry with tooth enamel was suggested and tested in three laboratories, as described in Wieser et al (2008). The aims of the present inter-laboratory comparison were i) to share and disseminate the methodology suggested in Wieser et al (2008) among a large number of laboratories in order to find a common field of discussion, hopefully leading to the harmonization of the method; ii) to evaluate the applicability of this approach to a large number of laboratories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of investigations showed that each method possesses restrictions in its application for complex (external and internal) radiation exposure, especially for low-dose exposure. The application of these methods for the Techa River situation required additional work on improvement of methods performed recently in collaboration with European colleagues Fattibene et al 2006;Wieser et al 2008;Darroudi et al 2008;). Reliable estimates of cumulative anthropogenic dose in bricks of the old buildings in Metlino and Muslyumovo were obtained with use of the luminescent method (Jacob et al 2003;Bougrov et al 2009;Degteva et al 2008a;Ulanovsky et al 2009).…”
Section: Validation Of External Dosesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For table 27, the angular coefficient (slope) was normalized by the gain used in EMR measurement of each compound; as for the dose-response curve analysis, it was not considered. Also, the detection limit presented was calculated by the method described previously in Wieser et al (2008), also applied by Fattibene et al (2011). Analyzing the linear fittings, lithium formate, by far, has the higher sensitivity, followed by sodium formate and sodium dithionite.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%