SAE Technical Paper Series 2003
DOI: 10.4271/2003-22-0019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Pelvis and Upper Leg Injury Risk in Car-Pedestrian Collisions: Comparison of Accident Statistics, Impactor Tests and a Human Body Finite Element Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cortical wall thickness did not consistently agree with the incidence of fracture. (Snedeker et al, 2003). Hood height is defined here using a ''wraparound'' technique by which a line segment is rotated from the upper bumper edge to the point on the hood that makes first contact with the pedestrian femur or hip.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Cortical wall thickness did not consistently agree with the incidence of fracture. (Snedeker et al, 2003). Hood height is defined here using a ''wraparound'' technique by which a line segment is rotated from the upper bumper edge to the point on the hood that makes first contact with the pedestrian femur or hip.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 considering hood height, pedestrian stature, the angle of impact, and vehicle speed provides a rough estimate of the resulting pelvic load. For an indepth treatment of the kinematics underlying this relationship, the reader is referred to Snedeker et al (2003). As can be seen in Table 2, neither the ratio of hood height to hip height nor hip contact velocity consistently explained the occurrence of pelvic/acetabular fracture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Modeling of the hip bone under impact was published [19] but the consequences of the bony deformation on perineal structures were not performed in that study. "Whole body" models [19,24,25] and models of the torso [27,31] have the same deWciencies and do not respond to the issue.…”
Section: Conditions Producing the Mechanical Lesionsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…While vehicle-to-PMHS tests or simulations may provide a better understanding of new protection devices, complexity of PMHS testing and the lack of fully validated human models have turned the attention of many researchers towards simple tests or models. Vehicle sled bucks were used in pedestrian PMHS tests by Snedeker et al [20] to assess the pelvis and upper leg injury risk. While these simplified bucks reasonably approximated the geometric characteristics of current vehicle front-ends, no information about a correlation with the vehicle stiffness was provided.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%