2001
DOI: 10.1007/s001340101049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of PEEP-induced reopening of collapsed lung regions in acute lung injury: are one or three CT sections representative of the entire lung?

Abstract: PEEP-induced reopening of collapsed lung regions measured on a single or three CT sections sensibly differs from the reopening of collapsed lung regions measured on the overall lung. The inhomogeneous distribution of PEEP-induced reopening of collapsed lung regions along the cephalocaudal axis probably explains these discrepancies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
1
7

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
34
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Of peculiar importance is the requirement for assessing alveolar recruitment on the whole lung. It has been clearly shown that assessing alveolar recruitment on 1 or 3 CT sections may result in a gross overestimation or underestimation of alveolar recruitment of the whole lung [40]. As reported in supine patients with ARDS, alveolar recruitment resulting from PEEP predominates in nondependent and cephalic lung regions, is rather limited in the diaphragmatic region and can even be negative (alveolar derecruitment) caudally to the diaphragmatic cupola [36,41].…”
Section: Measurement Of Alveolar Recruitment and Lung Overinflationmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of peculiar importance is the requirement for assessing alveolar recruitment on the whole lung. It has been clearly shown that assessing alveolar recruitment on 1 or 3 CT sections may result in a gross overestimation or underestimation of alveolar recruitment of the whole lung [40]. As reported in supine patients with ARDS, alveolar recruitment resulting from PEEP predominates in nondependent and cephalic lung regions, is rather limited in the diaphragmatic region and can even be negative (alveolar derecruitment) caudally to the diaphragmatic cupola [36,41].…”
Section: Measurement Of Alveolar Recruitment and Lung Overinflationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As a consequence, assessing alveolar recruitment on a single juxta-diaphragmatic CT section often underestimates recruitment of the whole lung. In contrast, because apical and juxta-hilar CT sections are more representative of upper lobes than of lower lobes, assessing alveolar recruitment on 3 CT sections often overestimates recruitment of the whole lung [40].…”
Section: Measurement Of Alveolar Recruitment and Lung Overinflationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calculations based on density measurements, in contrast, are more robust because average density is less sensitive to small errors in boundary registration. Several important studies have highlighted the potential errors associated with undersampling or single-slice analysis (32,33). Alternatively, whole lung or lobar analysis permits the use of conservation of mass principles to measure changes in absolute air or tissue volumes.…”
Section: Assumptions and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus the quantitative analysis is very laborious and time consuming, which precludes its use in the daily patient management [35,37,38]. In order to expand the possibility to use the quantitative analysis to estimate lung recruitment, Lu et al studied only one or three lung CT images instead of the whole lung CT scan, which required a significantly lower time [7]. However, the agreement was poor because of the inhomogeneous distribution of the disease in the lung parenchyma [7,21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to its simplicity the multiple pressure-volume curve has been proposed as an adequate surrogate for the estimation of lung recruitment [5,6]. However, it may underestimate lung recruitment in patients with focal aeration loss [7]. Electrical impedance tomography provides noninvasive real-time imaging of pulmonary inflation which could predict the lung recruitability [8], but it computes only a small fraction of the lung and is affected by the movements of intrathoracic blood due to the application of PEEP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%