2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.11.084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Patterns of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Adults with Congenital Heart disease — International Study (APPROACH-IS): Rationale, design, and methods

Abstract: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02150603.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
124
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
124
0
Order By: Relevance
“…19 In summary, inclusion criteria were age 18 years or above, known CHD with continuing follow-up and the ability to complete self-report questionnaires. APPROACH-IS is an international cross-sectional multicenter study conducted in partnership with the International Society for Adult Congenital Heart Disease (ISACHD).…”
Section: Study Design and Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 In summary, inclusion criteria were age 18 years or above, known CHD with continuing follow-up and the ability to complete self-report questionnaires. APPROACH-IS is an international cross-sectional multicenter study conducted in partnership with the International Society for Adult Congenital Heart Disease (ISACHD).…”
Section: Study Design and Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inclusion criteria were: (a) diagnosis of CHD before the age of 10 years, (b) age 18 years or older at enrolment (c) ongoing follow-up in a CHD centre or included in a national/regional database and (d) being in possession of physical, cognitive and language capabilities to answer the self-reporting questionnaires. Full details of rationale, design and methods have been previously published [6]. In Malta, the English language version of the questionnaires was used due to lack of availability of questionnaires appropriately translated to the Maltese language.…”
Section: Study Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SWLS consists of five statements each requiring a response of 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree), with total scores ranging from 5 to 35 [11]. An SWLS score of 20 is the neutral point on the scale [6]. CHD lesion severity was classified in accordance with the recommendations of Task Force 1 of the 32nd Bethesda Conference [12].…”
Section: Variables and Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The importance of lifelong follow-up is well-recognised and specialist care is established in most countries [2]. These trends have led to an increasing interest in the investigation of long-term psychological functioning, social aspects, perceived health status and quality of life of adult CHD survivors [3]. A number of studies have focused on employment and education, with most suggesting a negative impact imposed by CHD, albeit to varying degrees [4][5][6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%