1986
DOI: 10.1001/archinte.1986.00360230126018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Patients With Office Hypertension by 24-Hour Noninvasive Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1,21,25,26 Pavlov showed that sympathetic nervous system reactions were weakened by repeated exposure to stimulus, which may explain why there is a gradual fall of BP and HR in a patient who attends an outpatient clinic frequently. 25,45 This adaptation effect is consistent with our finding of minimum mean SBP at year 5 and minimum mean DBP at year 2 despite increasing age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,21,25,26 Pavlov showed that sympathetic nervous system reactions were weakened by repeated exposure to stimulus, which may explain why there is a gradual fall of BP and HR in a patient who attends an outpatient clinic frequently. 25,45 This adaptation effect is consistent with our finding of minimum mean SBP at year 5 and minimum mean DBP at year 2 despite increasing age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…White-coat hypertension has been described in patients who have elevated blood pressure in the doctor's office but normal values during 24-hr ambulatory recordings [7,47]. Furthermore, restraint stress and swim stress enhance sympathetic activity, which causes an increase in plasma NA and AD [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, readings obtained while the patients were in the clinic are included in these components. The mean number of total CLIN readings in the 100 procedures ±SEM (range), was 4.9±0.1 (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8). Clinicunrelated readings were defined as those occurring during routine daily activities (ACT), did not include those while bedbound or asleep, and their mean number was 17.4±0.5 (4-30) in the 100 procedures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Knowledge of the magnitude of this response can have implications for patient management and for assessment of cardiovascular risk. The magnitude of the white coat phenomenon has been estimated in outpatients by comparison of intra-arterial 3 or noninvasive 4 ambulatory BPs to sphygmomanometric readings in the clinic. These approaches did not take into consideration possible differences attributable to the use of two methods of measurement.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%