Assessment of patient-reported outcome measures used in corneal transplantation: a systematic review

Senthil, Mallika Prem; Chakraborty, Ranjay; Lim, Jeremiah K. H.

doi:10.1080/08164622.2022.2033106

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 41 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The International Consortium on Health Outcomes Measurement works to define, standardise and implement outcome measures that really matter to patients, for example the tracking of dietary issues in colorectal cancer ( 98 ) . Patient-reported outcome measures have been predominantly developed to explore single interventions that can be delivered in a uniform way to large numbers of patients, for example ophthalmic and orthopaedic surgery ( 99 , 100 ) . In medical conditions requiring nutrition interventions, for example diabetes ( 101 ) and inflammatory bowel disease ( 102 , 103 ) , treatment is often combined with other medical interventions, for example medication or physical activity, making it difficult to identify the effect on outcomes that are due to nutrition alone.…”

Section: Challenges and Solutionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Nature of the evidence base and approaches to guide nutrition interventions for individuals: a position paper from the Academy of Nutrition Sciences

Hickson,

Papoutsakis,

Madden

et al. 2024

Br J Nutr

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This Position Paper from the Academy of Nutrition Sciences is the third in a series which describe the nature of the scientific evidence and frameworks that underpin nutrition recommendations for health. This paper focuses on evidence which guides the application of dietary recommendations for individuals. In some situations, modified nutrient intake becomes essential to prevent deficiency, optimise development and health, or manage symptoms and disease progression. Disease and its treatment can also affect taste, appetite, and ability to access and prepare foods, with associated financial impacts. Therefore, the practice of nutrition and dietetics must integrate and apply the sciences of food, nutrition, biology, physiology, behaviour, management, communication, and society to achieve and maintain human health. Thus, there is huge complexity in delivering evidence-based nutrition interventions to individuals. This paper examines available frameworks for appraising the quality and certainty of nutrition research evidence, the development nutrition practice guidelines to support evidence implementation in practice, and the influence of other sources of nutrition information and misinformation. The paper also considers major challenges in applying research evidence to an individual and suggests consensus recommendations to begin to address these challenges for the future. Our recommendations target three groups; those who deliver nutrition interventions to individuals, those funding, commissioning, or undertaking research aimed at delivering evidence-based nutrition practice, and those disseminating nutritional information to individuals.

show abstract