2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.04235.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Patient Dignity in Geriatric Palliative Care

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We previously reported results of a pilot study using Chochinov’s Patient Dignity Inventory 1 in a Geriatric Palliative Care Unit (PCU). 2 While greater dignity-related distress was experienced amongst geriatric PCU patients, the specific PDI items identified as concerns were remarkably consistent with studies of cancer patients across the adult lifespan in community and hospital settings. 3,4 We extend our previous findings with a report on associations amongst dignity-related concerns and clinical severity of mood, anxiety, and physical symptomatology.…”
supporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We previously reported results of a pilot study using Chochinov’s Patient Dignity Inventory 1 in a Geriatric Palliative Care Unit (PCU). 2 While greater dignity-related distress was experienced amongst geriatric PCU patients, the specific PDI items identified as concerns were remarkably consistent with studies of cancer patients across the adult lifespan in community and hospital settings. 3,4 We extend our previous findings with a report on associations amongst dignity-related concerns and clinical severity of mood, anxiety, and physical symptomatology.…”
supporting
confidence: 67%
“…Mean total score on the PDI was 51.7 (SD = 22.5). One-third of the PDI items were rated by patients as being problematic, falling primarily within Dependency (42%), Symptom Distress (38.9%), and Existential Distress (34.6%) domains (see table in the study by Mah et al 2 for mean item ratings). Approximately one-fifth of the patients reported moderate to severe anxiety and depressive symptomatology (HADS score > 11; HADS-A: 19%; HADS-D: 22%).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 33 papers were included in the final review. Two papers 33,34 involved the same cohort of participants, with results from different perspectives; unless otherwise specified, these papers will be treated as one study. Similarly, the studies by Chochinov et al 35 and Hack et al 36 reported differing analysis of the same cohort/dataset, which will be treated as one study; this gives a total of 31 studies from 33 papers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of papers achieved a moderate quality score; one paper 35 was considered to be of high methodological quality. The remaining six papers scored low for methodological quality; in three cases, this was due to the paper being published as a letter to the editor 33,34,38 with limited detail being available. In the other three cases, 49,58,61 insufficient methodological information was provided in the article.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation