2015
DOI: 10.1590/0102-311x00133814
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of participation bias in cohort studies: systematic review and meta-regression analysis

Abstract: The proportion of non-participation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
(50 reference statements)
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, our design also had limitations. Although similar to other studies (Silva Junior et al, 2015 ), the participation rate in the current study was low, suggesting some degree of self-selection. The different profiles of participants and non-participants may have had some effect on the findings of the study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…However, our design also had limitations. Although similar to other studies (Silva Junior et al, 2015 ), the participation rate in the current study was low, suggesting some degree of self-selection. The different profiles of participants and non-participants may have had some effect on the findings of the study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Individuals who dropped from the study were older and had lower educational level at baseline than those who remained. Age and level of education have been frequently found as predictors of nonparticipation in many previous cohort studies (Silva Junior, Santos, Coeli, & Carvalho, ). Fourth, as in other large general population surveys, information about deaths by suicide was not collected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Therefore, we anticipate no changes in our results had the same measurement been available at both time-points. However, CES-D and K10 are based on self-reported information that comes with measuring errors and information bias (Silva Junior et al ., 2015 ). Finally, in our study, only information on seeing an MHCP in the past month for their feelings was available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%