2010
DOI: 10.5926/jjep.58.263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Participants’ Theories of Intelligence : Reliability and Validity of the Implicit Association Test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The scale used to assess the entity theory in the current study consists of items worded in highly abstract terms, such as “kind of person” (Levy et al, 1998), in contrast to the PBS, which contains items that refer to everyday trait words. Thus, the relationship between the entity theory and the physiognomic belief may be more clearly observed if the former is assessed using more tangible items; measurement of implicit associations between the concept of fixedness and personal attributes (Fujii & Uebuchi, 2010; Mascret, Roussel, & Cury, 2015) may be useful for this purpose.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scale used to assess the entity theory in the current study consists of items worded in highly abstract terms, such as “kind of person” (Levy et al, 1998), in contrast to the PBS, which contains items that refer to everyday trait words. Thus, the relationship between the entity theory and the physiognomic belief may be more clearly observed if the former is assessed using more tangible items; measurement of implicit associations between the concept of fixedness and personal attributes (Fujii & Uebuchi, 2010; Mascret, Roussel, & Cury, 2015) may be useful for this purpose.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, there was only one IAT linked to implicit theories of intelligence (Fujii and Uebuchi 2010), in Japanese. The target concepts were intelligence and luck, so, this IAT measured whether individuals associated their results more strongly with one than the other.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We employed the Japanese-translated version [ 59 ] of the Implicit Theory of Intelligence Scale [ 60 ]. This scale has construct validity and internal consistency [ 59 , 60 ] and comprises three items (e.g., “You have a certain amount of intelligence and you really can’t do much to change it”).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%