2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11605-007-0114-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Pancreatic Neoplasms: Review of Biopsy Techniques

Abstract: Pancreatic cancer is the 4th leading cause of cancer death annually. Recent technological advances in imaging have led to non-uniformity in the evaluation of pancreatic neoplasms. The following article describes the history behind various biopsy techniques and the rationale for obtaining a biopsy of a pancreatic neoplasm and discusses the benefits and disadvantages of the various pancreatic biopsy techniques, including fine needle aspiration biopsy, Tru-cut needle biopsy, endoscopic brushings/cytology, and end… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These tumors require a multimodal diagnostic approach, combining clinical history, radiological imaging studies, histopathology, immunohistochemistry, and ultrastructural studies. When a diagnosis can be made from a FNA specimen and can lead to a change in the management of the patient, a FNA should be included in this multimodal diagnostic approach 4. We report a case of a 66 year‐old man who underwent an ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle‐aspiration and core biopsy of a liver lesion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These tumors require a multimodal diagnostic approach, combining clinical history, radiological imaging studies, histopathology, immunohistochemistry, and ultrastructural studies. When a diagnosis can be made from a FNA specimen and can lead to a change in the management of the patient, a FNA should be included in this multimodal diagnostic approach 4. We report a case of a 66 year‐old man who underwent an ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle‐aspiration and core biopsy of a liver lesion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4][5] The sensitivity of FNA has been shown to range from 45 to 100% (site dependent) with a specificity approaching 100% and diagnostic accuracy ranging from 60 to 95%. [2][3][4][6][7][8] However, there are limitations to EUS-guided FNA. Cytologic interpretation of FNA specimens can be difficult in specimens with obscuring blood, necrotic material, inflammatory cells, or from neoplasms requiring immunohistochemical (IHC) studies for definitive classification.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pathological confirmation. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and percutaneous core needle biopsy are two common methods for obtaining tissue samples in p-NENs (17).…”
Section: Results and Consensus Statementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison, percutaneous core needle biopsy has relatively greater availability, lower cost, a higher success rate, enables access to sufficient material and allows access to lesions in any part of the pancreas (17,(25)(26)(27). Sufficient material can be extracted to determine cell type and origin via histologic and immunohistochemical analyses, thus, allowing for reliable differentiation of p-NENs (28).…”
Section: Results and Consensus Statementsmentioning
confidence: 99%