2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2011.02.057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of osteopenic women microarchitecture with and without osteoporotic fracture by TBS on a new generation bone densitometer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have documented the value of the TBS in assessing fracture risk in postmenopausal women [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. The value of TBS for assessing risk is both sizeable and independent of BMD, which makes sense given the increasing understanding of the importance of bone architecture in determining bone strength [1,[9][10][11]35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies have documented the value of the TBS in assessing fracture risk in postmenopausal women [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. The value of TBS for assessing risk is both sizeable and independent of BMD, which makes sense given the increasing understanding of the importance of bone architecture in determining bone strength [1,[9][10][11]35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The added value of the TBS in bone mineral densitometry for fracture risk assessment has been documented in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. The objective of the current study was to assess the sensitivity of TBS to detect change over time in a large cohort of treated versus untreated older women.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the published research on TBS, to date, has been conducted in patients with presumed primary osteoporosis, or in whom risk factors for secondary osteoporosis were not considered in the analysis. In such studies, TBS has been shown to predict both current [55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64] and future/incident [65][66][67][68] fragility fractures. Additional studies have addressed the impact of efficacious therapies for osteoporosis on TBS measurements.…”
Section: Tbs Predictions Of Current and Future Fragility Fractures: Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This added value of TBS has been further documented in cross-sectional, prospective and longitudinal studies (11)(12)(13)(14)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35). Indeed, TBS has been found: 1. to be lower in post-menopausal women with a past osteoporotic fracture compared with age-and BMD-matched women without fracture (11), 2. to give an incremental increase in the odds ratio for spine fracture when combined with spine BMD (12,(21)(22)(23)(24)(25), 3. to be lower in women with fractures compared with women without frac-…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…tures, irrespective of whether their BMD met the criteria for osteoporosis or osteopenia (13,(21)(22)(23)(24)(25), 4. to prospectively predict fracture as well as spine BMD (14,26,27), 5. to recapture around 1/3 of the patients who were miss-classified according to the BMD WHO definition of osteoporosis alone (21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27), and 6. to be responsive to treatment therapy (28)(29)(30)(31)(32).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%