Abstract:We used single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) to determine the long-term risk of degenerative change after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). Our study population was a prospective series of 31 patients with a mean age at injury of 27.8 years (18 to 47) and a mean follow-up of ten years (9 to 13) after bone-patellar tendon-bone reconstruction of the ACL. The contralateral normal knee was used as a control. All knees were clinically stable with high clinical scores (mean Lyshol… Show more
“…The prevalence of PTOA after ACL injury is conflicting because of the different classification methods for defining OA in the literature. 28 For patients with isolated ACL injuries, PTOA prevalence ranges from 0% to 39%, [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] whereas prevalence is higher among individuals with combined ACL and meniscal injuries (21%-100%). 31,34,[36][37][38] However, Oiestad et al 28 suggested that poor methodologic quality of studies has led to overestimation of PTOA rates and that prevalence may be closer to 13% in patients with isolated ACL injuries and between 21% and 48% in those with combined ACL and meniscal injuries who are at least 10 years postinjury.…”
Section: Risk Factors For Ptoa Joint Injurymentioning
Osteoarthritis is a leading cause of disability whose prevalence and incidence continue to increase. History of joint injury represents an important risk factor for posttraumatic osteoarthritis and is a significant contributor to the rapidly growing percentage of the population with osteoarthritis. This review will present the epidemiology associated with posttraumatic osteoarthritis, with particular emphasis on the knee and ankle joints. It is important to understand the effect of posttraumatic osteoarthritis on the population so that sufficient resources can be devoted to countering the disease and promoting optimal long-term health for patients after joint injury.
“…The prevalence of PTOA after ACL injury is conflicting because of the different classification methods for defining OA in the literature. 28 For patients with isolated ACL injuries, PTOA prevalence ranges from 0% to 39%, [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] whereas prevalence is higher among individuals with combined ACL and meniscal injuries (21%-100%). 31,34,[36][37][38] However, Oiestad et al 28 suggested that poor methodologic quality of studies has led to overestimation of PTOA rates and that prevalence may be closer to 13% in patients with isolated ACL injuries and between 21% and 48% in those with combined ACL and meniscal injuries who are at least 10 years postinjury.…”
Section: Risk Factors For Ptoa Joint Injurymentioning
Osteoarthritis is a leading cause of disability whose prevalence and incidence continue to increase. History of joint injury represents an important risk factor for posttraumatic osteoarthritis and is a significant contributor to the rapidly growing percentage of the population with osteoarthritis. This review will present the epidemiology associated with posttraumatic osteoarthritis, with particular emphasis on the knee and ankle joints. It is important to understand the effect of posttraumatic osteoarthritis on the population so that sufficient resources can be devoted to countering the disease and promoting optimal long-term health for patients after joint injury.
“…Blood-pool images of the ankles and the hindfoot were compared with those of the contra-lateral side, and graded from 0 to 2: grade 0, no increased radioisotope uptake; grade 1, minimal increased uptake; or grade 2, markedly increased uptake. This classification is a modification of the grading system used by Hart et al 19 for the examination of the knee joint. Delayed scintigraphy was performed 4.5 h after radioisotope injection.…”
The combined single-photon emission computed tomography and conventional computed tomography (SPECT/CT) technique has increased the sensitivity and specificity of bone scans. We examined the value of using SPECT/CT for the assessment of coronal plane hindfoot deformities. Twenty-seven patients with varus (11 patients) or valgus (16 patients) malalignment of the hindfoot were assessed using radiography, conventional CT, bone scintigraphy, and SPECT/CT. The amount of deformity, stage of osteoarthritis, and level of activation on bone scans and SPECT/CT were measured. Activation was assessed in 12 regions of interest. The stage of osteoarthritis seen on plain radiographs correlated significantly with the level of activation detected on bone scans (p < 0.05). No correlation was observed between the amount of deformation and activity, and between bone scan activation and signs of osteoarthritis on CT scans. The varus malaligned ankles showed higher radioisotope uptake in the medial areas, while the valgus malaligned ankles showed increased uptake in the lateral areas (p < 0.05). SPECT/CT may be a valuable tool for the assessment and staging of osteoarthritis. Our findings underline the adverse effects of coronal plane deformity of the hindfoot. In addition, results from this study provide useful information for future basic research on coronal plane deformity of the hindfoot and for determining appropriate surgical approaches. ß
“…In the last decade magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) were increasingly used for evaluation of tunnel widening, as these promised higher accuracy and lower inter-or intra-observer variabilities 9,10,18,45 . Only few Authors have used bone scans, single-photon emission tomography (SPECT) or multi-modality imaging such as SPECT/CT to follow-up their patients after ACL reconstruction 11,13 . A variety of different algorithms and measurement methods using conventional radiographs, MRI or CT, whether in 2D or 3D have been described to evaluate bone tunnel widening 1-4, 6-10, 13, 15, 17-20, 22, 23, 26, 28-33, 37-47 .…”
SummaryBackground: Comparing different imaging modalities and methods for assessment tunnel widening after ACL reconstruction and providing a detailed evidence-based literature overview. Methods: PubMed was searched from 1970 to 2016 using the terms "ACL reconstruction" and "tunnel" and "imaging" or "CT" or "computerized tomography" or "MRI" or "magnetic resonance imaging" or "radiographs". 647 studies were found. 575 articles were excluded due to absence of specific radiological measurement methods of tunnel widening and 40 due to repetition of a previously published radiological measurement method. 32 articles were included reporting interand intraobserver reliabilities of tunnel measurement methods after ACL reconstruction. Results: A variety of different algorithms and measurement methods using radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography or SPECT/CT evaluating tunnel position and bone tunnel enlargement have been described. Tunnel delination restricts an exact analysis using X-ray. Measurements using CT or MR were mostly obtained perpendicular to the tunnel axis or using specialized software for tunnel volume calculation in 3D. Based on the review the width of the femoral and tibial tunnels should be assessed perpendicular to the tunnel axis at different levels in relation to the joint. At least one measurement should be performed at the tunnel entrance, exit and midpoint of the tunnel. Conclusion: CT should be considered the gold standard assessing tunnel widening in patients after ACL reconstruction. If specialized software is available calculating the tunnel volume, measurements should be preferably performed in 3D CT. Level of evidence: II.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.