2008
DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-9-5-76
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Oral Malodor: A Comparison of the Organoleptic Method with Sulfide Monitoring

Abstract: Aim The purpose of the present study was to measure the oral malodor of volunteers by means of a subjective organoleptic method and a sulfide monitor as well as to evaluate the diagnostic value of the Halimeter® in the diagnosis of halitosis. Methods and Materials Sulfide monitoring and organoleptic oral malodor assessment methods were performed on 77 volunteers (51 females, 26 males) selected from academic staff, students, clerks, and patients of the Shaheed Beheshti University of Medical Sciences and Healt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
23
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Various olfactorial methods have been described in the literature for estimating the intensity of halitosis (35–38). The most widely used scoring index is the one introduced by R osenberg and coworkers, with scores ranging from 0 to 5 (7, 8).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various olfactorial methods have been described in the literature for estimating the intensity of halitosis (35–38). The most widely used scoring index is the one introduced by R osenberg and coworkers, with scores ranging from 0 to 5 (7, 8).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The examiner also refrained from drinking coffee, tea or juice, smoking, and using scented cosmetics 12 hours before the assessment. [131415]…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Halimeter reading, based on the method used in similar studies,[1415] was categorized into 3 as follows: Normal = 0-180 parts per billion (ppb), Weak = 181-250 ppb, Strong = > 250 ppb. Baseline measurements were taken in the morning before tooth brushing.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Halimeter ® reading, based on the method used in similar studies,2425 was categorized into three types, as follows: Normal = 0-180 parts per billion (ppb), weak = 181-250 ppb, and strong = >250 ppb.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%