Proceedings of First International Oil Conference and Exhibition in Mexico 2006
DOI: 10.2523/104016-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Oilfield Souring Mechanisms by Mass Spectrometry Analysis of the Stable Sulfur Isotopes Ratio

Abstract: TX 75083-3836, U.S.A., fax 01-972-952-9435. AbstractReservoir souring is defined as the increase mass of gaseous Hydrogen Sulfide (H 2 S) per unit mass of produced fluids. Unless the onset of H 2 S takes place either during the appraisal of the well or in the very early stages of oil and/or gas production, it is not quite straightforward to identify the origin of souring. Under reservoir conditions, H 2 S is extremely reactive thus being able to react with native H 2 Ssequestering agents and be converted to me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, field applications of isotopes to the souring problem have largely been restricted to using sulfur isotopes to differentiate between H 2 S formed from highly fractionating microbial sulfate reduction and H 2 S from abiotic thermochemical sulfate reduction (Aplin and Coleman, 1995 ; Poli et al, 2002 ; Cavallaro et al, 2005 ; Martins and Marques, 2006 ). This is based on the observation that thermochemical sulfate reduction often shows an apparent zero fractionation between reservoir minerals and H 2 S, thought to result from when the sulfate reduction itself is kinetically faster than the release of sulfate to solution (Machel et al, 1995 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, field applications of isotopes to the souring problem have largely been restricted to using sulfur isotopes to differentiate between H 2 S formed from highly fractionating microbial sulfate reduction and H 2 S from abiotic thermochemical sulfate reduction (Aplin and Coleman, 1995 ; Poli et al, 2002 ; Cavallaro et al, 2005 ; Martins and Marques, 2006 ). This is based on the observation that thermochemical sulfate reduction often shows an apparent zero fractionation between reservoir minerals and H 2 S, thought to result from when the sulfate reduction itself is kinetically faster than the release of sulfate to solution (Machel et al, 1995 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%