2017
DOI: 10.24925/turjaf.v5i2.132-138.971
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Nutrient Contents of Modified Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana) Starch

Abstract: Modification processes can change the physicochemical and structural properties of native starch, thereby increasing its industrial applications. Finger millet starch (FMS) was modified with casava starch (CS), guar gum (GG) and xanthan gum (XG) modifiers at the ratios of 95:5%, 90:10%, 80:20% and 75: 25%, for each of the modifier. The proximate and mineral compositions of the modified starch were determined using standard methods. Atomic absorption spectrometry method was used to quantify the mineral contents… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Higher ash content of sample TSOC (5.6%) recorded in the sample with the highest turmeric ratio (10 g) could be due to high ash content in Turmeric compared to sample GSOB (2.9%) of Ginger flour ratio (10 g). Evidence has shown that addition of food ingredients brings about an improvement of the nutritive value of food [21]. This suggests that sample TSOC will provide more minerals in the complementary food than the other samples and is in line with [22].…”
Section: Proximate Compositionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Higher ash content of sample TSOC (5.6%) recorded in the sample with the highest turmeric ratio (10 g) could be due to high ash content in Turmeric compared to sample GSOB (2.9%) of Ginger flour ratio (10 g). Evidence has shown that addition of food ingredients brings about an improvement of the nutritive value of food [21]. This suggests that sample TSOC will provide more minerals in the complementary food than the other samples and is in line with [22].…”
Section: Proximate Compositionmentioning
confidence: 78%