2007
DOI: 10.1038/labinvest.3700659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of normalization strategies for quantitative RT-PCR using microdissected tissue samples

Abstract: Gene expression measurement techniques such as quantitative reverse transcriptase (qRT)-PCR require a normalization strategy to allow meaningful comparisons across biological samples. Typically, this is accomplished through the use of an endogenous housekeeping gene that is presumed to show stable expression levels in the samples under study. There is concern regarding how precisely specific genes can be measured in limited amounts of mRNA such as those from microdissected (MD) tissues. To address this issue, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Smaller ΔC T , less difference between the reference and interest gene expression, resulting in an increased expression of the target gene (smaller ΔC T , higher target gene expression); **cancers (n=34), benign tumors (n=15), non-tumor (n=20); *** cancers (n=50), benign tumors (n=10), non-tumor (n=30) between samples, irrespective the type of processed samples. Our results regarding the amount and the purity of the RNA (measured spectrophotometrically) and RNA integrity number (RIN) (quantified on RNA electrophoregrams) obtained from LCM samples were comparable with other studies [32,35,36].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Smaller ΔC T , less difference between the reference and interest gene expression, resulting in an increased expression of the target gene (smaller ΔC T , higher target gene expression); **cancers (n=34), benign tumors (n=15), non-tumor (n=20); *** cancers (n=50), benign tumors (n=10), non-tumor (n=30) between samples, irrespective the type of processed samples. Our results regarding the amount and the purity of the RNA (measured spectrophotometrically) and RNA integrity number (RIN) (quantified on RNA electrophoregrams) obtained from LCM samples were comparable with other studies [32,35,36].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Additionally, transcription of these genes is generally resistant to experimental conditions, making them suitable endogenous controls for single-gene normalization (52,55). The use of a single gene for data normalization can decrease cost and increase throughput, and is a standard approach for normalizing qPCR (52,53,56,57). It is only accurate, however, if the above requirements are satisfied.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Expression of the housekeeping gene (HKG) is run in parallel with qRT-PCR detection of genes that change expression levels due to experimental conditions. HKG expression is superior to other qRT-PCR normalization standards, such as cell count and total RNA levels (Erickson et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%